Lawyer Sues Opposing Lawyer For Defamation

from the careful-what-you-say dept

You don't see this one every day. A lawyer is suing the opposing lawyer in a high profile controversial case about a teenaged runaway, claiming that the opposing lawyer defamed him, by saying in a TV interview that he was "unqualified" and "that he has terrorist ties." While the latter clearly could be defamatory (the former might be... but seems more like a statement of opinion, not fact), it does make you wonder if such a lawsuit really is effective in preventing "damage to his reputation." I would think that most people would recognize the statements in context, rather than automatically assuming they were true.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    mark, Sep 10th, 2010 @ 4:19pm

    Defamation.

    A lawyer's character is what he trades on. Shutting OC up through a lawsuit may be appropriate.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    Ron Rezendes (profile), Sep 10th, 2010 @ 4:20pm

    If only...

    ...we could get lawyers to eat other lawyers then our problems would diminish exponentially at mealtimes!

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    icon
    harbingerofdoom (profile), Sep 10th, 2010 @ 5:10pm

    shakespeare was right.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 10th, 2010 @ 5:20pm

    Re: If only...

    Problem is that they reproduce exponentially, because they are, in reality, viruses.

    This may surprise you, but think about it:

    Lawyers seek a host and infect him, drain him of resources (usually crippling him or killing him in the process) and, in the end, just leave that host and seek a new one. They also serve no useful purpose, other than reproducing themselves (and crippling/killing hosts).

    They have a complex and interesting outer shell, but really not much inside once you take a good look. Also notice that, like viruses, they also don't attack their own kind (although some weird mutations sometimes happen that may cause that).

    They also have interesting ways of spreading themselves around. Some viruses are airborne, seeking new hosts through a process called "word-of-mouth", where previous hosts help them spread to new hosts simply by saying good things about them. Others remain dormant until someone enters in contact with them. Physical contact is often not necessary. A phone call could be sufficient.

    The only way to really kill the viruses is to kill all potential hosts, or hope someone invents a cure, that generally works by blocking the reproduction mechanism of the viruses. But these so called "cures" have proven ineffective, as the ever growing population of lawyers attests.

    /totally offtopic

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    icon
    The Mighty Buzzard (profile), Sep 10th, 2010 @ 5:56pm

    Re: Defamation.

    Huh, and here I always thought it was their lack of character that made them the big bucks.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 10th, 2010 @ 6:21pm

    >claiming that the opposing lawyer defamed him, by saying in a TV interview that he was "unqualified" and "that he has terrorist ties."

    Well if he keeps wearing the Osama Bin Ladden line of neck wear he gets what he deserves.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Known Coward, Sep 10th, 2010 @ 6:56pm

    Lawyers

    First, kill all lawyers.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    icon
    LeBazz (profile), Sep 10th, 2010 @ 7:18pm

    where's Average Joe ??

    Since you're studying to be a lawyer, what do you think of this particular story, dear Average Joe ???

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 10th, 2010 @ 9:02pm

    Re: Defamation.

    Lawyers have character?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  10.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 10th, 2010 @ 11:14pm

    Re: Defamation.

    a lawyer has no character

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  11.  
    identicon
    TDR, Sep 11th, 2010 @ 7:32am

    What do you call a hundred lawyers at the bottom of the English Channel?

    A good beginning! :p

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  12.  
    icon
    Hephaestus (profile), Sep 11th, 2010 @ 8:29pm

    Re:

    What do you call a hundred politicians at the bottom of the English Channel?

    A good beginning! :p

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  13.  
    identicon
    Phil, Sep 12th, 2010 @ 1:00pm

    Defamatioin

    For those interested in Internet defamation - i have just set up a blog. www.defamous.com

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  14.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Sep 13th, 2010 @ 2:57am

    not sure about this, "professional" peoples "opinions" carry far more weight and clout than an average Joe saying it, he may have some claim, maybe enough to win, not sure, but maybe enough to make the other guy make a public retraction

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  15.  
    identicon
    Pete Austin, Sep 13th, 2010 @ 3:36am

    Terrorist Ties

    What terrorist ties look like [online shop]
    http://www.zazzle.co.uk/obama+bin+laden+ties

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  16.  
    icon
    baditup (profile), Sep 13th, 2010 @ 10:00am

    "I would think that most people would recognize the statements in context, rather than automatically assuming they were true."

    Yes, one logical person might think that, however the vast majority of people have NO common sense or logic and their belief process starts before their thinking process so they're already preconditioned to accept what they hear/read as fact. Humanity fail.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This