Disney's Keychest: Is Giving Back Your Fair Use Rights With More DRM Really A Step Forward?

from the redefining-fair-use dept

A bunch of folks have sent in different stories about Disney’s new “Keychest” technology offering, which would (in theory) allow users to purchase content that would be stored online, and which they could then access from any “participating service.”

With Keychest, when a consumer buys a movie from a participating store, his accounts with other participating services–such as a mobile-phone provider or a video-on-demand cable service–would be updated to show the title as available for viewing. The movies wouldn’t be downloaded; rather, they would reside with each particular delivery company, such as the Internet service provider, cable company or phone company.

The idea, supposedly is:

to address two of the biggest hurdles blocking widespread consumer adoption of movie downloads: the difficulty of playing a movie back on devices other than a PC or laptop, and limited storage space on those computers’ hard drives.

Now, while you must admit that allowing people to access the same content after a single purchase on multiple devices is definitely a step up from the “old” way of doing things, it does kind of ignore some important points: such as the fact that, for the most part, you could already do this on your own. As we know, it’s legal to rip your CD’s and then store that content on an iPod or on your computer and listen to the music how you want to do so. And, even though this is perfectly legitimate fair use of content for movies as well, Hollywood has used the worst provision in the DMCA — the anti-circumvention provision — to block people from doing what is accepted fair use with movie and television content.

So all Keychest really seems to be doing is giving you back your fair use rights on content — but also wrapping it in additional DRM, such that it only works on “participating services.” Oh, and it could include other limitations as well:

And Keychest would allow movie studios to dictate how many devices, connected to which distribution networks, a given title can be played on.

So, kudos to Disney for recognizing that people hate having to buy the same content over and over again and hate being limited on what devices they can view content on… but, creating a new, more permissive DRM solution, just to give back some of an individual’s fair use rights, isn’t really a huge win.

Filed Under: , , , , ,
Companies: disney

Rate this comment as insightful
Rate this comment as funny
You have rated this comment as insightful
You have rated this comment as funny
Flag this comment as abusive/trolling/spam
You have flagged this comment
The first word has already been claimed
The last word has already been claimed
Insightful Lightbulb icon Funny Laughing icon Abusive/trolling/spam Flag icon Insightful badge Lightbulb icon Funny badge Laughing icon Comments icon

Comments on “Disney's Keychest: Is Giving Back Your Fair Use Rights With More DRM Really A Step Forward?”

Subscribe: RSS Leave a comment
15 Comments
Steven (profile) says:

Re: Re: I'm surprised...

This is actually much worse. You never have the content so there is no hope of recovering the video. At least with other failed services there was the possibility to crack the DRM and recover your purchased media.

Not only that, but you would have to have a consistent high speed connection in order to use your video. So much for watching on the train, or letting the kids watch that movie in the Van on the way to grandma’s.

chris (profile) says:

Re: I'm surprised...

What happens to your locked up content when Disney decides that Keychest is no longer a profitable venture and shuts it down?

you have to buy it again, just like yo did with the CD and the DVD. duh.

don’t tell me you “fair use pirates” want to buy something, be able to play it on anything, and have it never become obsoleted?

Devonavar (user link) says:

Convenience and creepiness

My guess is they’ll have some limited success from consumers who don’t know how to rip and don’t care about copyright issues.

Personally, the creepiest part of this is it lets Disney know exactly who is buying their physical products. The conspiracy theorist in my wonders if they will be tying physical purchases to pirated material.

Anonymous Coward says:

Is that Mickey Mouse movie made in 1928 still under copyright?

Or is it presently in the “Disney vault” along with Walt’s head.

People sure were ignorant back then. 1928 was a long time ago. If you told them that one day the people would travel to the moon they would have laughed in your face. Science fiction!

It’s a good thing that small piece of our cultural heritage is locked away. We shouldn’t be allowed to touch it, at least, not without paying for the privelage.

You should always pay for the things from our past. You don’t expect to get to the future by stealing, now do you?

Daemon_ZOGG (profile) says:

Disney has done it again...

HEY DISNEY!! With the upcoming Holloween holiday..

Are you going to THREATEN LITTLE CHILDREN with LAWSUITS AGAIN, if they wear your stupid Barney character costumes?!

DRM died a long time ago. The masses don’t want it. And as demand grows even more, they will always find a way around it.

“Piracy is demand where there is no supply.”

This new idea of yours.. is a cruel joke on on the world.

Piss-off Corporate disney. You are NOT the disney I grew up with.

🙁

}:>

Add Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here

Comment Options:

Make this the or (get credits or sign in to see balance) what's this?

What's this?

Techdirt community members with Techdirt Credits can spotlight a comment as either the "First Word" or "Last Word" on a particular comment thread. Credits can be purchased at the Techdirt Insider Shop »

Follow Techdirt

Techdirt Daily Newsletter

Ctrl-Alt-Speech

A weekly news podcast from
Mike Masnick & Ben Whitelaw

Subscribe now to Ctrl-Alt-Speech »
Techdirt Deals
Techdirt Insider Discord
The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...
Loading...