After Finding No Joy Elsewhere, SCO Chairman Takes Anti-Porn Fight To ICANN
from the silent-majority dept
A few years ago, Ralph Yarro, the chairman of everybody's favorite tech company, SCO, put forward a plan to ban all internet porn from port 80, the port used by HTTP traffic. He later added that open WiFi should be banned as a means to stop porn. Not surprisingly, his ideas failed to find traction (except with the governor of his home state, Utah) but Yarro and his anti-porn group are pressing on, and are now asking ICANN to set up a "Cybersafety Constituency" to create binding rules on how to deal with net porn. How's this for a binding rule: don't access porn sites, and you won't be bothered with it? The idea that anybody -- let alone ICANN -- should be able to play the role of global web censor is scary, and opens the door to restrictions on all sorts of objectionable, but not illegal, content. As The Register notes, Yarro called for supporters to make comments on the proposal at ICANN's site, and plenty of people from Utah obliged. Wonder what all the people in the state who love net porn think of the proposal...






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
uh...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
"Here's your sign!"
(if you've heard of Bill Engvall at all, the above shouldn't need any explanation ;))
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
SCO - hahaha
What a bozo
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Option 2: Try to violate the fist amendment by right to freedom of expression/speech, try to outright ban just a certain portion of the internet because a small group of people don't like it and instead of being good parents have to propose ludicrous legislation to "protect" the children.
Guess which option they choose...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Where is all the Porn?
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Yes and they're not the only ones
Now the same kind of group-think is threatening ICANN from a different direction: the same indefatigable crowd that wants to stop all progress in order to assuage the fears of certain trademark holders. I wrote another article about that.
Things are happening over at ICANN. It's a space to watch.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: SCO - hahaha
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
I don't understand
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3514.html
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
i agree
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
i agree
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment