RSS
Twitter
Lawyer Seriously Slapped Down For SLAPP Attempt Against Librarian Blogger
from the ouch dept
We've covered the concept of SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) suits plenty of times before. These are bogus lawsuits filed to try to bully a critic into shutting up. In one such case, involving an incredibly broad subpoena against a librarian blogger compiling information on the potential link between mercury and autism, a magistrate judge has seriously smacked down the lawyer who filed the subpoena. The blogger had merely published on her blog information about the fees the lawyer in question had received. In response, the lawyer subpoenaed a ridiculous amount of information from her: "all documents pertaining to the setup, financing, running, research, maintaining" of the blog, "including communications with representatives of the federal government, the pharmaceutical industry, advocacy groups, non-governmental organizations, political action groups, profit or non-profit entities, journals, editorial boards, scientific boards, academic boards, medical licensing boards, any 'religious groups (Muslim or otherwise), or individuals with religious affiliations,' and any other 'concerned individuals.'"
The judge quashed the subpoena quickly, but has now hit back really hard on the lawyer, Clifford Shoemaker, for filing it in the first place:
Shoemaker has not offered a shred of evidence to support his speculations. He has, he says, had his suspicions aroused because she has so much information. Clearly he is unfamiliar with the extent of the information which a highly-competent librarian like Ms. Seidel can, and did, accumulate. If Shoemaker wanted to know if Ms. Seidel was in part supported by or provided information by Bayer, he could have inquired of Bayer or limited the Seidel subpoena to that information. Instead he issued the subpoena calling for production of documents and a deposition on the day before he stipulated to dismiss the underlying suit with prejudice. His failure to withdraw the subpoena when he clearly knew that suit was over is telling about his motives. His efforts to vilify and demean Ms. Seidel are unwarranted and unseemly....Now that's a smackdown.
I find that Clifford Shoemaker violated Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(1) and Rule 45(c)(1).... The 11(b)(1) violation may also violate Virginia's Rules of Professional Conduct .... Clifford J. Shoemaker’s action is an abuse of legal process, a waste of judicial resources and an unnecessary waste of the time and expense to the purported deponent.
The Clerk of Court is directed to forward a certified copy of this order, the motion to quash, the show cause order, and the response of Shoemaker and Seidel to the appropriate professional conduct committee of the Virginia State Bar in order that it may be made aware of Clifford J. Shoemaker's conduct and so that those authorities may take whatever action they deem appropriate.
As a sanction from this court, Clifford J. Shoemaker is ordered to attend within three months, a continuing legal education program on ethics and on the discovery rules in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. He is ordered to file a certification of completion of the programs.
Reader Comments
(Flattened / Threaded)
I think Ron Simmons said it best: "DAMN."
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
pwned!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
When a judge reports you to the State Bar, you're definitely pwned.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re:
... and THEN sends you back to school!
Truly schooled. :p
EtG
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
We'll all sign it!
Can we get that judge's mailing address? I think we should get a thank-you card and all sign it and send it to him.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: We'll all sign it!
I'll be the first to sign it.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Steps to the front of the crowd....
...
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Steps to the front of the crowd...
...slow claps.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Steps to the front of the crowd...
... joins the applause.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Steps to the front of the crowd...
...applause building and quickening in pace.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Steps to the front of the crowd...
"...slow claps."
er... gradual onset of VD?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Well it's about time somebody put a lawyer in his place. Hopefully this will set a good precedent for future similar abuse of our legal system.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Now if only someone did the same to the RIAA lawyers... :/
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
Amen !
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Holy crap
Buy that Judge a case of 12 year old scotch !!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
"involving an incredibly broad subpoena against a librarian blogger compiling information on the potential link between mercury and autism"
I think "compiling information on the lack of a link between mercury and autism" might be a more accurate description of Ms. Seidel's work.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Lowered expectationsL
Slapped down? I don't think so, mildly inconvenienced and embarrassed perhaps. How about a nice big fine, disbarment or some jail time, to me that would be a slap down.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Lowered expectationsL
> How about a nice big fine, disbarment or some jail time,
> to me that would be a slap down.
A judge doesn't have the legal authority to disbar an attorney. Only the state bar can do that.
As for the fine/jail, a judge can only do that if the lawyer has met the elements of criminal contempt of court, which filing an overbroad subpoena does not do.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Lowered expectationsL
I believe the judge did everything in his power without overstepping his authority.
It will be up to the Virginia Bar Assn. to penalize him further. They will likely fail in this endeavor...but again, disbarment is not up to the judge.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Lowered expectationsL
"The Clerk of Court is directed to forward a certified copy of this order, the motion to quash, the show cause order, and the response of Shoemaker and Seidel to the appropriate professional conduct committee of the Virginia State Bar in order that it may be made aware of Clifford J. Shoemaker's conduct and so that those authorities may take whatever action they deem appropriate."
Hmm, this would look like the beginning of disbarrment procedure.
Oh and the bit about continuing education in ethics, etc. is hilarious.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Raised expectationsL
I think he's probably referring to how well the judge presented the decision, not necessarily the decision itself.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
People 1: Sharks and bottom feeders: 0
SMAACKDOWN!!!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Let the courts know!
You can submit a survey regarding the judges performance here!! http://www.courthouseforum.com/forums/evaluationtrial.php?id=537&which=judge
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Let the courts know!
Great, done it, all "A"s except the "don't knows".
Need more judges like this.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
We nee more...
..Judges who think and rule like this.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
I think the lawyer should have gotten the information that he asked for. The judge was obviously paid off by the blogger and her contacts.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re:
Why? there is no reason to ask for that info BUT to intimidate and restrict freedom of speech/the press. Which, BTW, is designed to prevent corruption and public blindness to corruption. Honestly, we need more of it.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re:
I thought he was being sarcastic...lol. I read it in a sarcastic way and it sounded better to me since it is usually the little people that get crushed by lawyers and their high dollar clients.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
And free speach wins.
This judge, I would totally hug in public. THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THE WIN. SLAPP suits are filled with lots of Fail.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Buuurrrrnnnneeeddddd....
Kinda makes you feel all warm and fuzzy inside doesn't it? :-)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Don't mess with the gravy train
'Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(1) and Rule 45(c)(1).... The 11(b)(1) violation may also violate Virginia's Rules of Professional Conduct.'
Should've known. The oldest one in the book.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
BWAAAAHAHAHAHA!
OWNED!! In a nut shell, the Judge called the lawyer out as a hack, and ordered his ass back to school. He's also implying that the State bar should sanction him as well. Funniest thing EVAR!!!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Beautiful
Score 1 for the public.
Very glad to see this. Very glad indeed.
I will join in the clapping, card signing, and I am going to fill out that review the judge survey thing.
Woot!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Awesome
Now why can't he be the judge for some of these frivilous **AA suits filed by sleezeball lawyers! Nothing like seeing a lawyer literally schooled!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
You think the Virginia Bar will notice this?
"The Clerk of Court is directed to forward a certified copy of this order, the motion to quash, the show cause order, and the response of Shoemaker and Seidel to the appropriate professional conduct committee of the Virginia State Bar in order that it may be made aware of Clifford J. Shoemaker's conduct and so that those authorities may take whatever action they deem appropriate. "
I think the fact that it comes from a sitting judge will ensure that they at least look at this guy.
I suspect the lawyer will be teaching ethics to pre-law students in some community college in 5 years.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Two new Seidel posts on Shoemaker's, uhm, professional conduct
I was one of the bloggers named in Shoemaker's subpoena, which is my dog in the hunt.
You may find Seidel's two latest posts of interest. I've included the first paragraph of each extensive and detailed post.
Billing the Adversary
http://www.neurodiversity.com/weblog/article/165
Inspecting the Outstretched Palm
http://neurodiversity.com/weblog/article/166/
The content of these two posts is possibly what Shoemaker intended to block with the quashed subpoena.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment