Data Portability Can Mitigate Privacy Issues >>
<< It's Good To Be A Monopoly: Bell Canada Tells...
 tdicon 


(Mis)Uses of Technology

by Mike Masnick

Tue, Mar 25th 2008 8:05pm




Filed Under:
census, technology


Forget E-Voting Problems, Now We Have To Worry About E-Census Problems Too

from the new-technology-isn't-always-good... dept

It looks like the US census is the latest process to be prematurely "automated" under the silly belief that computers automatically do everything better. Reports are coming out about how the new computerized census systems aren't just costly, they might also be inaccurate (bonus!). The system involves handheld devices for census-takers, but the devices are apparently not that intuitive. Thus there are additional training costs involved, and no one seems keen on paying for that. There are a few options here, including mostly ignoring the new system (which only cost $600 million in taxpayer money) and going back to a more manual process. However, the company that provided the devices insists the complaints are overblown and with just half an hour of training anyone could understand how to use the devices. Either way, it should be a reminder that any attempt to automate a process that uses the "just add technology!" component probably is going to be something of a disaster.

9 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Anthony, Mar 25th, 2008 @ 8:47pm

    Next up...

    Devices that automate the automating of automation...

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    Andy, Mar 25th, 2008 @ 8:57pm

    I'm waiting for devices that automate failure, so we don't have to be burdened with failure ourselves.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    I don't know that "everyone" can be trained

    identicon
    Haywood, Mar 25th, 2008 @ 9:15pm

    "with just half an hour of training anyone could understand how to use the devices." One must remember the people who go out to do census counts are very likely the hard core unemployed. I don't think that makes them highly trainable.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    Aren't Censuses Outdated?

    identicon
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro, Mar 25th, 2008 @ 10:58pm

    Isn't statistical sampling both cheaper and more accurate?

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    Re: Aren't Censuses Outdated?

    identicon
    Kevin, Mar 26th, 2008 @ 4:01am

    Isn't statistical sampling both cheaper and more accurate?

    Cheaper? Yes.

    More accurate? Maybe.

    Legal for a US Census? Nope.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  

    Re: I don't know that "everyone" can be trained

    identicon
    rebrad, Mar 26th, 2008 @ 5:16am

    I thought we used illegal aliens for jobs that hard core unemployed Americans can't or won't do? Makes as much sense as anything else now days. I just wonder why all the automation. The constitution requires a body count. Why does the government need to know what kind of toilet paper is used.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Mar 26th, 2008 @ 6:44am

    OK, who wants to sign up to be a census worker in Newark, NJ?

    We do have systems that automate failure. Its called ERP systems. If you don't fix the process before you automate it, you just do the wrong things faster.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  

    Alternatively

    identicon
    Someone Else, Mar 26th, 2008 @ 10:10am

    this article sounds more like its from the new-technology-is-never-good department

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  9.  

    Why???

    identicon
    Sal, Mar 27th, 2008 @ 4:52pm

    Why does the government have to have custom built EVERYTHING??? What is wrong with an off the shelf PDA or smartphone with the census form loaded as software??? I've seen our local convience stores using Palms for inventory control. Why does our federal (and often state) government need everything built special for them when off the shelf components would work just fine and save the taxpayers a lot of money??????????

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


Data Portability Can Mitigate Privacy Issues >>
<< It's Good To Be A Monopoly: Bell Canada Tells...
 tdicon 

A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss

Powered by Postrank

From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This