Kentucky Lawmaker Introduces Bill To Make Anonymous Cowards Illegal
from the so-many-problems dept
Just about everyone seems to be submitting the story from last week about a local Kentucky legislator who has put forth a bill to make anonymous comments online illegal. I first saw the story on Digg, but it's been submitted about 30 times already and is starting to show up elsewhere -- sometimes with inflammatory headlines (including the one at Digg). First off, this is for Kentucky only. Second, the chances of the bill getting anywhere are slim to none. Third, even if it does miraculously pass, there is no way that it would be enforceable. In fact, even the guy who introduced the legislation admits as much. Fourth, the bill is clearly unconstitutional, violating our rights to anonymous speech (which has been reaffirmed many times by US courts). Fifth, it goes against section 230 of the CDA in that it puts the blame on service providers for the speech of their users, rather than putting the liability on the users themselves. In other words, while this gets some attention as a ridiculously bad bill, the chance of it actually going anywhere or having any impact at all is virtually nil.
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
First Post by Anonymous Coward on Mar 10th, 2008 @ 9:01pm
So Sue Me ;)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Iron Chef on Mar 10th, 2008 @ 9:19pm
That makes as much sense as the Boulder Colorado legislator who wants to lock cats indoors and keep them on leashes...
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Jake on Mar 10th, 2008 @ 9:39pm
Very true, Iron Chef. But since I spent nearly ten years being woken up by the family moggies and next-door's tomcat trying to disembowel each other, and have met numerous people on the Internet whom I'd just love to be able to identify -albeit probably not for the reasons this legislator has in mind- I can see why they're attractive in the abstract.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
lol by illegalprelude on Mar 10th, 2008 @ 10:08pm
hahaha. Mike, I love the topic. Only regular readers of the site I believe get it. But here is what I dont understand, why spent the money to attempt to pass such ridiculous laws and to what purpose. And more so, is that tax payer money being used to do such things?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: by Iron Chef on Mar 10th, 2008 @ 10:20pm
Hi Jake,
I enjoyed your comments immensely! But I have to ask, have you read the commentary from the legislator?
Like the efforts of this Kentucky legislator, they could be equated to trying to kill a fly with a jackhammer. Someone’s feelings were hurt. And until it’s realized that the GEN-X crowd inherently doesn’t like criticism, as they were brought up thinking they were “special” (Thanks, Fred Rogers) we’re going to continue infighting.
Things have changed. The world is becoming more complex and globalized. Someone needs to step up and be the voice of reason.
Again, this is a societal problem.
http://www.dailycamera.com/news/2008/mar/09/keeping-kitty-on-a-leash/
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by It Wasnt me on Mar 10th, 2008 @ 10:36pm
wanted to post as "Anonymous Coward" but 1st poster beat me to it :(
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Anonymous Coward on Mar 10th, 2008 @ 11:13pm
haha
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Anonymous Coward on Mar 10th, 2008 @ 11:33pm
politicos like to push bills they know won't fly, if they know it'll generate headlines. That's how they maintain name recognition. Bad legislation uses up term time and is far easier to craft than good legislation.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Anonymous Coward on Mar 10th, 2008 @ 11:34pm
That's it I'm boycotting Kentucky. No more Bourbon, Chicken and horse races.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Anonymous Coward on Mar 10th, 2008 @ 11:35pm
I bet they support King George
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Jake on Mar 10th, 2008 @ 11:50pm
Heh. I figured that just going by the above article would enable me to give him the benefit of the doubt, and assume he just wants the chance to hunt down every moron he meets online and set their house on fire.
On a serious note, I'm all in favour of compelling the owners of discussion forums and the like to be more proactive in keeping some measure of order, but the proposals he's putting forward are grossly disproportionate and in direct contradiction to a couple of dozen different laws. If he's serious about this and not pulling some kind of rentaquote publicity stunt, his best bet is to push for an amendment to the CDA compelling service providers to delete posts, ban users and inform the relevant authorities where possible in the event of a criminal offence -but not a civil one- being committed through their site.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: by Iron Chef on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 12:27am
Easily the ideology behind "Wikinomics" by Don Tapscott is that "It will only hurt you if you let it."
So does it hurt, Jake?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Kentucky Lawmaker by Known Coward on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 12:42am
He can go fly a kite.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Anonymous Coward on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 1:36am
Bite me Kentucky
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Anonymous Coward on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 1:49am
Don't they have anything better to do? Like inbreeding... bestiality... something else?
Those wacky Kentuckians. When will they learn?
~Ju don know who I am.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Anonymous Coward on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 2:49am
Wow! the home of the brave and the home of the free. Will they try to ban proxy's next? Go after servers NOT in their Sate or the US for that matter?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Anonymous Coward on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 2:49am
Wow! the home of the brave and the home of the free. Will they try to ban proxy's next? Go after servers NOT in their Sate or the US for that matter?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
We pay these people to do what? by Michael G. on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 2:55am
It just amazes me that we pay, and some of you elect, these people to sit up there and waste time on bills that haven't a chance be passed. Days, weeks, maybe months to come up with something that even he knew was a waste of time when we're all about to pay $4.00 a gallon for gas with no end in site.
Signed: Senator Whistle Dick
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
How about no anonymous voice votes in Congress by Dave Feustel on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 3:34am
If we're going to ban anonymous internet access, how about
banning also anonymous voice votes in Congress so we know
how each representative votes (or not) on every bill. No
more unrecorded voice votes!
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Weelll, I think them fellers in Kin-tucky... by GeneralEmergency on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 3:53am
...oughter be aspending less time afrettin'bout the dang internets and more time aworryin'bout the dang shortage of first cousins in the bluegrass state.
(OK, I admit, that one was harsh.)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
as a kentuckian... by Jason Still on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 5:50am
As someone born and raised in western KY and a current resident of Louisville, I'd like to apologize to everyone for this guy's foolishness as well as pretty much everything more than about 35 miles east of Louisville (especially Lexington and specifically the University of KY, anyone who's attended it, thought about attending it, or been a fan of their sports teams). If we give you bourbon will you forget about that half of the state and forgive us?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by Overcast on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 6:40am
So then I would lie about who I am?
Would 'Overcast' qualify as 'non-anonymous' or do I have to use my REAL name?
I guess someone pissed him off on a blog.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
yuh by ME on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 6:52am
Kind of like all that illegal pr0n.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Sigh... by Neal on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 6:58am
As if Kentuckians weren't mocked enough for their stupidity now we've got lawmakers who'd consider themselves proud to be dumber than a fifth grader.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Kentucky Jelly by James on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 9:19am
Call up the 800# on the KY bottle and tell them that "Kentucky" Jelly just doesn't taste right (bonus points if you use a thick southern accent).
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: by Jake on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 9:55am
Iron Chef: I don't quite follow you. I'm not saying I'm not thick-skinned enough to handle the odd troll, but I don't see why they should be allowed to get away with distressing the more sensitive and annoying the hell out of everyone else. Nor do I think 'Generation X' are going to grow up without some prodding, and God knows what kind of damage some of the examples I can think of will do when they get old enough to vote.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re: by Jason Still on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 10:18am
maybe I'm misreading you, but the last members of generation x have been of voting age for quite some time
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Re: Re: Re: by Iron Chef on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 10:19am
You win, my friend. :-)
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
@It Wasnt me by Anonymous Coward on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 10:34am
I'm pretty sure you and the first poster are the same person, anyways.
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Why?? by John on Mar 11th, 2008 @ 3:32pm
Like post #18 mentioned, why in the world was this bill even introduced? If the guy sponsoring the bill thinks it has no chance to pass, then why even start the process? Why waste time, money, and resources on a bill that is clearly useless? Are the lawmakers that bored or that desperate for attention that they propose bills which will never pass?
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
by happycat on Apr 3rd, 2008 @ 6:49am
why does the content of message boards even need to be monitored? i have every right to proclaim jews did 9/11 just to piss off ridiculous people who take this stuff seriously. not to mention it's true lamo XD
(reply to this comment) (link to this comment)
Add Your Comment