Businesses Prefer Not to Be Sued, Film at 11
from the public-private-'partnerships' dept
There's nothing up on its website about this yet, but the U.S. Chamber of Commerce has thrown its ample weight into the warrantless wiretapping fight, with a letter to the House of Representatives urging legislators to approve retroactive immunity for cooperative telecoms as part of changes to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The letter, from the organization's VP for government affairs, R. Bruce Josten, argues:
The Chamber represents companies across various industries which own or operate vital components of the nation’s critical physical, virtual, and economic infrastructures. The federal government continually depends upon such industries for cooperation and assistance in national security matters, including homeland security programs and activities. The government also turns to these companies in times of crisis, when the speed, agility, and creativity of the private sector can be critical to averting a terrorist attack.In the 2006 election cycle, the Chamber gave $19,000 to Democratic candidates for the House and $76,500 to Republicans. Its contributions have been more evenly split in this cycle to date: $15,076 for Democrats and $16,500 to Republicans. Members in close races will therefore likely find the "urges" of the Chamber hard to ignore.Therefore, the Chamber urges the House to consider S. 2248 and pass this bipartisan compromise legislation. The Chamber firmly believes that the immunity provisions in S. 2248 are imperative to preserving the self-sustaining “public-private partnership” that both Congress and the Executive Branch have sought to protect the United States in the post-September 11 world. The Chamber encourages you consider the effects on the nation’s security should private sector involvement be muted and relegated to the sidelines in instances when industries can help the government protect this nation.
7 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- Senators Wyden & Udall To DOJ: Stop Saying Patriot Act Isn't A Secret Law When You Know It Is
- Ron Wyden Puts Hold On FISA Amendments Act; Wants Answers To How Many Americans Have Been Spied On
- Is Your Senator Using The Distraction Of The Debt Ceiling To Support The Feds Secret Interpretation Of Spying Laws?
- Howard Berman Looks To Send More Hated US IP Cops Around The Globe
- ACLU Sues Over New Surveillance Act





Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
"$15,076 for Democrats and $16,500 to Republicans"
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Cheap
For that money, which is less than some people spend on their new cars, we could buy some -good- laws for a change.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Hmm
" ... the Executive Branch have sought to protect the United States in the post-September 11 world."
Well, didn't take long to pull out the "post 9-11" terminology. I am surprised we didn't see anything in here about "protecting the children". What a load of crap.
There are already laws set in place for these sort of things. Even if it is really urgent, the government can rush it through to a jugde and get him to issue a warrant pretty fast. Warrants are required for a reason. The telcos knew this. They broke the law. They need to pay.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Stop funding the terrorists!
No more Oil Wars!
Energy Independence Now!
Drill in Anwar.
Build more nuclear power plants
Use More coal.
Use more natural gas
Turn trash into energy
Double the efficiency of windmills and solar cells.
If France can do nuclear power so can we.
If Brazil can do biomass/ethanol power so can we.
If Australia can do LNG power so can we.
Domestically produced energy will end the recession and spur the economy.
Stop paying oil dollars to those who worship daily at the alter of our destruction.
Preserve our Civil Rights and defend our Freedom by ending dependence on foreign oil.
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
The letter
http://www.uschamber.com/issues/letters/2008/080227_fisa.htm
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment