FCC Chairman Talks Up Open-Access Wireless Networks

from the different-tune dept

Just last month, we noted how FCC Chairman Kevin Martin sounds like a broken record when it comes to telecom policy, always covering the same ground with his same old ideas of what constitutes a competitive market. Maybe the summer heat has gotten to him, but he's now gone and changed all that, as he's getting ready to propose dramatic new rules for the upcoming 700 MHz wireless spectrum license auction, mandating that winners of licenses for a third of the spectrum build open-access networks -- networks that allow any compatible device to connect and for any service to be run across them. The 700 MHz spectrum is pretty prime real estate, as these things go: there's a lot of spectrum that will be available, and the low frequency gives it excellent propagation and building-penetration characteristics. There's been a lot of talk from tech companies and other groups about handling these licenses differently than previous ones, in order to encourage the development of broadband wireless networks that offer real competition to fixed-line networks. Typically, this entails mandating that license winners build wholesale networks which sell access to any service provider that wants to then sell the service on to consumers. While Martin's draft of rules doesn't go that far, it does offer a significant change to how wireless spectrum licenses have typically been sold and regulated. Unsurprisingly, the trade group of cellular operators isn't happy, and says that there's no need to regulate what it sees as a perfectly competitive marketplace. Whether or not the cell phone service market is competitive is an argument for another day, but it's pretty clear that as things stand now, it doesn't have much of a competitive impact on the broadband market, which is still largely a duopoly of cable and telephone companies. The operators hope to use their deep pockets to buy up as much spectrum as possible -- not just to use it themselves, but to keep it out of the hands of any potential new entrants that could come into the market and actually compel them to compete.


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Mark Landers, Jul 10th, 2007 @ 3:03pm

    has Sprint been set up?

    When Sprint and Nextel merged, the combined company found itself with a ton of spectrum in the 2500mHZ range, something of around 80% of the space in the top 100 markets. The FCC allowed them to keep that spectrum, provided Sprint would commit to bulding out a nationwide WiMax network. WiMax sounds a lot like the "open access" network you mention. Sprint's well on their way to building out that network (to the tune of a rather large load of cash), and now, if I read this the right way, the FCC wants to open up the 700Mhz spectrum in a way that could put Sprint's WiMax model at risk after they've been put on the hook for spending a ton of capital. I'm not saying that we shouldn't have plenty of competition in the wireless broadband space, but I'm wondering if anyone would at Sprint would feel they were duped by the FCC into making such a huge committment?

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    identicon
    anonymous coward, Jul 10th, 2007 @ 4:15pm

    if it was up to the Bush-era FCC, there would be one corporation that owned all spectrum and it would sit unused so that company, Western Union, could protect its telegraph business and the huge corporate donations that it would be making...

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Mark, Jul 10th, 2007 @ 5:01pm

    Why not

    It's good to see the public able to freely use other freqs besides 26.9 to 27.4 MHz

    Apparently Google has interest in this Spectrum, although they have repeatedly stated they aren't. http://www.fiercewireless.com/story/google-counsel-we-may-buy-700mhz-spectrum/2007-05-24

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 10th, 2007 @ 6:52pm

    "the operators hope to use their deep pockets to buy up as"

    many politicians as possible.

    What sickens me even more is how cheaply they can be bought. It seems to me that a high graft price would indicate some degree of reluctance to sell out their country - but they go cheap.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    Web 2.0 My Web Beta

    As any other corp. they would have a bid ;, a sale;, comprhesible application as to purchase for any proccess(s) or Intellectual Properties and or controls! Especially if Mac systems or Microsoft/ Windows Inc. have a viabilty for Purchase? So WHAT THE F________________?>???

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Chronno S. Trigger, Jul 11th, 2007 @ 5:16am

    Re:

    It's a competitive market out there. If they can't buy a politician for $1,000 they'll go to the next and then the next until they find one that may have purchased that BMW a little too early and is a little hard up for cash. The politicians need to expect cheap because the corporations will just find someone for less. :P

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    anonymous coward, Jul 11th, 2007 @ 7:22am

    I'm sure that the cable, telephone, and cellular companies will pool BILLIONS of dollars to buy up this spectrum to keep Earthlink and Google out of this business.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  8.  
    identicon
    Jeffrey M. Wilson, Jan 19th, 2008 @ 9:57pm

    Any other Name

    Like what name would ITIS or ITS and or Windows Live? Live.com/PureStreamSystemsLiveWindowsLiveLive.com

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This