RSS
Since When Did Hollywood Get To Control Our Mobile Phones?
from the says-who? dept
Someone over at Verizon Wireless seems very confused about who the company's customers are. Of course, it's unfair to pick on just them, since almost all of the mobile carriers are thinking the same way, but it was the VP at Verizon Wireless who made a series of bizarre, short-sighted and flat-out wrong comments to the Associated Press that should have him looking for a new line of work. The AP piece starts out as a rehash of last week's story saying that the carriers have forced Motorola to shelve the iTunes phone for the time being. Then it shifts the story over to Verizon Wireless' decision to cripple Bluetooth on its phones to stop people from transferring content directly from their phones to PCs (or other phones) and require them to use their cellular connection (which, oh yeah, costs money). Verizon Wireless tries to defend the practice by claiming the entertainment industry made them do it. The quote comes from Jim Straight, vice president for wireless data and Internet services at Verizon Wireless, saying: "When it comes to the cell phone I have to abide by the rules of the content houses." No, actually, he doesn't. The content houses don't own the carriers. There's simply no reason why the makers of a communications platform should be crippling their devices to protect an obsolete broadcast business model. People are not buying mobile phones to get the latest Disney movie or hit song. They're buying them to communicate. If the big content companies don't want to play, it's their loss. People will continue to buy up mobile phones and communicate with them. No one's dying to have access to broadcast content on their phones. The content industry shouldn't be setting the rules here, and there's no reason why the carriers should be deferring to them.
3 Comments | Leave a Comment..
- If The RIAA Wants To Talk About Misinformation Campaigns, Let's Start With The RIAA's Misinformation Campaign
- UK Report Blames The Internet For Terrorism, Says ISPs Should Take Down Content
- NY Times: RIAA & MPAA Exaggerate Piracy Impact Stats... But We're Going To Assume They're True Anyway
- Author Jonathan Franzen Thinks That Ebooks Mean The World Will No Longer Work
- Misguided Twitter Protests... And Why Twitter Could Have Explained Itself Better
Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Phone Co. biz model
1. I dispise the phone companys for many of there semi-monopolistic practics. So when / if a company comes out with a phone that give users the feeling they actually own the thing insted of pay throw the nose rent it they will get my money.
2 I would stand inline to get a phone with the ipod interface. ( skip all the buttons ) wheel your way threw #s and lists.
3. Do i really want to pay to down load songs over flacky reception with mini interface and then not be able to use them on other phones ? or play them at home etc ?
just another mini-monopoly trying to stick us
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Phone Co. biz model
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Living abroad
Now don't get me started on my mobile experiences in the states...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment