Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   No Subject Given

   

   xman, Feb 10th, 2005 @ 3:13am

   
   

   Because the sort of people who are that stupid, simply wouldn't believe that they were being scammed - look at the people who keep paying 419ers

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   What's the OFT going to do?

   

   Michael Kohne, Feb 10th, 2005 @ 4:05am

   
   

   Call folks up and say "Hi there! I'm from the OFT and you're on a list of suckers we just got hold of. In the future, please be less stupid!". I think not.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   Mmmmmm

   

   thecaptain, Feb 10th, 2005 @ 4:21am

   
   

   I say that list should be WIDELY published, and perhaps broadcast on the 6 o'clock news.
   
   Maybe a little public humiliation would get people to smarten the heck up.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   Not a bad idea

   

   DV Henkel-Wallace, Feb 10th, 2005 @ 7:35am

   
   

   No, publicising it is the best because people don't like to be made fun of, so perhaps many who aren't yet on the list will think twice, and some who are (but don't realise it) will refrain from responding in future "so they won't get on that nasty list."
   
   Just human nature.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   Hello!

   

   Oliver Wendell Jones, Feb 10th, 2005 @ 8:12am

   
   

   Hello,
   
   It has come to our attention that your name and contact information is being passed around certain circles as part of a list of people who have fallen for scams and other con jobs in the past.
   
   In order to ensure that you don't fall for such similar scams in the future, please consider our patented "sucker-blocker" safety feature.
   
   For only $99.99 per day, we'll make sure that your name and information stays off this list.
   
   Don't be a sucker - pay up!

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   Re: Mmmmmm

   

   data64, Feb 10th, 2005 @ 9:28am

   
   

   Maybe a little public humiliation would get people to smarten the heck up.

   So what happens when the insurance companies start chanrging these people more for being on the list and banks deny loans or whatever. How about when scammers (or someone else) starts putting out fake lists with say politicians name on the list, especially just before an election. Would this lead to a protection racket "Pay me $X or your name goes on to the sucker's list"

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   note to self

   

   nonuser, Feb 10th, 2005 @ 10:02am

   
   

   Never buy anything from Ron Popeil or my name goes on some list. Check

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

8.  

   In a related announcement...

   

   drteknikal (profile), Feb 10th, 2005 @ 2:54pm

   
   

   The Office of Fair Trade has announced a record surplus for the fiscal year, and will remit it to the general fund as soon as it can be repatriated from Nigeria.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

9.  

   Re: Mmmmmm

   

   thecaptain, Feb 11th, 2005 @ 4:27am

   
   

   Always gotta push it too far. I don't really think Insurance companies will look anytime soon at who fell for a sucker's play on the big bad net. Unless they start selling fraud insurance to Joe-six-pack in a big way.
   
   I mean I'm sure there would be a legal way to fight this. Just like there's a way to fight bad credit when you are the victim of identity theft (although in my opinion, fighting THAT is a huge pain in the ascii and made more difficult for the victim than it needs to be....)

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

10.  

    Re: Mmmmmm

    

    xman, Feb 11th, 2005 @ 4:52am

    
    

    If people start trying to claim on insurance for being scammed then they will jump on it fast enough.

    [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment