(Mis)Uses of Technology

(Mis)Uses of Technology

by Mike Masnick




Touchscreen Problems In New Mexico: Touch One Candidate, Vote For The Other

from the whooooops dept

Just as a judge has decided that there couldn't possibly be any technical glitches on e-voting machines, reports are coming out of New Mexico that voters using e-voting machines tried to vote for one candidate and saw checkmark appear next to the other candidate. The whole thing sounds a bit suspicious. Voting officials blame (of course) "user error," suggesting they accidentally touched the screen in the wrong place. Ed Felten believes the machines are miscalibrated. Either one of these is quite scary. Even if the election officials are right, the fact that multiple people reported this problem suggests there's a real problem with these machines. If it is a calibration problem, that's even worse. The entire point of these machines is to let you vote accurately. The fact that they're making it into the voting booth miscalibrated to make clicking for one candidate really a vote for another suggests something is very, very wrong with the procedure required to set up and certify that these machines will safely and accurately record your vote.

8 Comments | Leave a Comment..

 
 

Reader Comments

(Flattened / Threaded)

    Oct 26th, 2004 @ 10:38am
  • Miscalibrated fingers?

    by Rob Henderson

    I manage a polling place that uses touch screen units. I have personal experience with the "I touched one voter and the other was selected issue". The main culprit? Long fingernails. Women with long nails (not meaning to be sexist here, I've just not experienced problems with long-nailed men) who are unused to touch screen units seem to want to touch the screen with the pad of their finger. Frequently, the tip of the fingernail touches first, on the candidate above the one they are targeting. A simple explanation, and the 'problem' goes away.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Oct 26th, 2004 @ 10:40am
    • Re: Miscalibrated fingers?

      You don't think that's still a problem? If that happens frequently, then the designers should have designed the system to avoid that. I'd believe the explanation you're saying, but it's still problematic that it happens. Instead of blaming the person (or their fingernails) why not design a system knowing that this is an issue?

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    • Oct 26th, 2004 @ 10:56am
    • Re: Miscalibrated fingers?

      by StuckWithADish

      The obvious solution here would be to "stagger" the checkboxes so that one is never directly above another one.
      I would be very interested to know how evenly distributed the errors are, i.e. what % of voters "accidentally" choose a Republican versus a Democrat. My cynical nature suspects it is something like 95% Republican.

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Oct 26th, 2004 @ 11:39am
      • Re: Miscalibrated fingers?

        by Beck

        They could fix this by providing a stylus to select the choices. It would work like the touch-screen debit card reader at Wal-Mart - you can use the stylus to input your debit card PIN, or you can just press the buttons with your fingers.

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

        • Oct 26th, 2004 @ 12:51pm
        • Re: Miscalibrated fingers?

          by dorpus

          Yeah, but then illiterate Mexicans will hold the stylus with their fist and punch a hole through the screen.

          (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      Oct 26th, 2004 @ 3:53pm
    • Re: Miscalibrated fingers?

      by Silverjets

      Ummm....why not just have a confirmation box pop-up that says, "You have selected candidate X. OK CANCEL" How hard would that be?

      (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

      • Oct 27th, 2004 @ 9:51am
      • Re: Miscalibrated fingers?

        by Rob Henderson

        When you select one choice, it gets a black X on an orange field next to it. If thet is not what you want, touch it again to deselect, and touch another choice. At the end of the ballot, after you have voted or bypassed every question, there is a summary screen that shows you all the races and your selections. The questions in which you did not make a selection are highlighted. Touching any question takes you back to that point in the ballot to allow you to alter your choice. Only once you have seen all the questions and the summary screen can you press the final "cast ballot" button.

        (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

    Oct 26th, 2004 @ 2:58pm
  • Problem? What problem?

    by Anonymous Hero

    Maybe this is the way they want them to work.

    (reply to this comment) (link to this comment)

Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML
Save me a cookie
  • Plain Text: A CRLF will be replaced by break <br> tag, all other allowable HTML is intact
  • HTML: No formatting of any kind is done without explicitly being written in
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <p> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Close
Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now.
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Plain Text HTML Save me a cookie

Search Techdirt
And now, a word from our Sponsors..



Subscribe to Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Techdirt's Daily Email Newsletter

Related Stories
Close
E-mail It