Even Bill Gates Gets Spyware

from the if-he-can't-figure-out-how-to-protect-himself... dept

For all those people who are complaining about how difficult it is to avoid spyware and adware on a Windows machine, take comfort (or be very, very afraid) in the knowledge that Bill Gates knows the same pain. In announcing that Microsoft would offer an anti-spyware utility of their own creation, Gates said: "I have had malware, (adware), that crap" on his home machines. Anyone want to suggest BillG start using Firefox to protect himself?


Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  
    identicon
    Seth Brundle, Oct 1st, 2004 @ 10:17pm

    I think you got spyware confused with something el


    "Anyone want to suggest BillG start using Firefox to protect himself? "

    I dont think you understand what spyware/adware is.

    The above would help more with certain virii, trojan jpegs, worms. Spyware and adware usually comes with downloaded applications - Firefox cant help you there.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  
    icon
    Mike (profile), Oct 1st, 2004 @ 10:25pm

    Re: I think you got spyware confused with somethin

    Um... it was a joke... I guess not a good one.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  
    identicon
    Pony99CA, Oct 2nd, 2004 @ 12:11am

    Re: I think you got spyware confused with somethin

    Actually, if the spyware/adware relies on IE browser helpers or ActiveX controls, Firefox most certainly will help.

    However, I'm not sure you understand what a worm really is. A worm is a self-propagating agent that goes from computer to computer without user intervention. The browser the user chooses to use won't matter at all.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  
    identicon
    Hexmathcoder, Oct 3rd, 2004 @ 9:24pm

    Re: I think you got spyware confused with somethin

    You can't seriously believe that worms and trojans "log in to net" so to speak, with IE or Firefox or Opera like Johnny End-User does. Dude, they communicate on ports and services the are open/exploitable. Bottom like Mozilla or Firefox reduce ad/spy/malware's ability to operate...in comparison to IE.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Oct 3rd, 2004 @ 11:16pm

    Perhaps someone should suggest...

    ...that his kid(s)/wife might be a security risk.

    Good thing they took him out of the loop a long time ago.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Peter da Silva, Jul 24th, 2005 @ 7:07am

    Not all adware/spyware is manually installed...

    There are ActiveX-based installers for many spyware programs, and ActiveX neither looks nor acts like a downloaded application, and can be stealth-launched by cross-zone exploits without even a dialog box coming up. Microsoft seems to have shut down most (but not all) of the cross-zone exploits with SP2, but there's still pre-SP2 systems out there, and there's still reports of new exploits.

    And even if Microsoft shuts down the cross-zone exploits, there's still the problem that ActiveX is too easy to run. You don't download and install ActiveX components, you just click "OK" on a routine dialog box. You can disable that by changing the setting for your security zones to block it instead of asking you, but that's not the default. And since there are legitimate sites that use ActiveX (though fewer are requiring it these days), a significant number of people who use IE are going to be reluctant to do that and they're expecting that dialog box to come up now and then and for it to be safe to say OK.

    So ActiveX spyware installers will remain a threat even if Microsoft DOES shut down the last cross-zone exploit as long as ActiveX is treated as an "internet" technology. Until Microsoft disables the use of ActiveX except for components that are manually installed and known to be sandboxed (that is, don't just assume all local ActiveX is safe and disable the ones that you've found holes in, as they do now) any browser that uses Microsoft's HTML control (including the latest Netscape browser) is inherently unsafe and should not be used.

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    xleojyc@mail.com, Oct 2nd, 2006 @ 7:53am

    faovnb sikle

    mftzwkdu qznlhxr xypc apuwjvorb mbxzsvnja lbxvu dqkuc

     

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>
Follow Techdirt
A word from our sponsors...
Essential Reading
Techdirt Reading List
Techdirt Insider Chat
A word from our sponsors...
Recent Stories
A word from our sponsors...

Close

Email This