Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

1.  

   I think you got spyware confused with something el

   

   Seth Brundle, Oct 1st, 2004 @ 10:17pm

   
   

   
   "Anyone want to suggest BillG start using Firefox to protect himself? "
   
   I dont think you understand what spyware/adware is.
   
   The above would help more with certain virii, trojan jpegs, worms. Spyware and adware usually comes with downloaded applications - Firefox cant help you there.
   
   

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

2.  

   Re: I think you got spyware confused with somethin

   

   Mike (profile), Oct 1st, 2004 @ 10:25pm

   
   

   Um... it was a joke... I guess not a good one.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

3.  

   Re: I think you got spyware confused with somethin

   

   Pony99CA, Oct 2nd, 2004 @ 12:11am

   
   

   Actually, if the spyware/adware relies on IE browser helpers or ActiveX controls, Firefox most certainly will help.

   However, I'm not sure you understand what a worm really is. A worm is a self-propagating agent that goes from computer to computer without user intervention. The browser the user chooses to use won't matter at all.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

4.  

   Re: I think you got spyware confused with somethin

   

   Hexmathcoder, Oct 3rd, 2004 @ 9:24pm

   
   

   You can't seriously believe that worms and trojans "log in to net" so to speak, with IE or Firefox or Opera like Johnny End-User does. Dude, they communicate on ports and services the are open/exploitable. Bottom like Mozilla or Firefox reduce ad/spy/malware's ability to operate...in comparison to IE.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

5.  

   Perhaps someone should suggest...

   

   Anonymous Coward, Oct 3rd, 2004 @ 11:16pm

   
   

   ...that his kid(s)/wife might be a security risk.
   
   Good thing they took him out of the loop a long time ago.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

6.  

   Not all adware/spyware is manually installed...

   

   Peter da Silva, Jul 24th, 2005 @ 7:07am

   
   

   There are ActiveX-based installers for many spyware programs, and ActiveX neither looks nor acts like a downloaded application, and can be stealth-launched by cross-zone exploits without even a dialog box coming up. Microsoft seems to have shut down most (but not all) of the cross-zone exploits with SP2, but there's still pre-SP2 systems out there, and there's still reports of new exploits.

   And even if Microsoft shuts down the cross-zone exploits, there's still the problem that ActiveX is too easy to run. You don't download and install ActiveX components, you just click "OK" on a routine dialog box. You can disable that by changing the setting for your security zones to block it instead of asking you, but that's not the default. And since there are legitimate sites that use ActiveX (though fewer are requiring it these days), a significant number of people who use IE are going to be reluctant to do that and they're expecting that dialog box to come up now and then and for it to be safe to say OK.

   So ActiveX spyware installers will remain a threat even if Microsoft DOES shut down the last cross-zone exploit as long as ActiveX is treated as an "internet" technology. Until Microsoft disables the use of ActiveX except for components that are manually installed and known to be sandboxed (that is, don't just assume all local ActiveX is safe and disable the ones that you've found holes in, as they do now) any browser that uses Microsoft's HTML control (including the latest Netscape browser) is inherently unsafe and should not be used.

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

7.  

   faovnb sikle

   

   [email protected], Oct 2nd, 2006 @ 7:53am

   
   

   mftzwkdu qznlhxr xypc apuwjvorb mbxzsvnja lbxvu dqkuc

   [ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

Add Your Comment