US Patent 6735568: Secrets For Successful Relationships

from the forget-chemistry dept

There's no end to the number of patents granted just for the sake of having a patent -- because patents lend the mystique of legitimacy and can be used as marketing gimmicks. But the scientific study of relationships is a legitimate field, so it shouldn't be too surprising that EHarmony.com has received a patent on relationships, called a "method and system for identifying people who are likely to have a successful relationship." Their rival, Match.com, obviously doesn't want to capitulate and calls the claims "ridiculous at best." The more interesting tidbit is that 20% of the people answering eHarmony's questionaire are rejected outright as not the marrying type. Maybe they're on to something, but that statistic doesn't quite seem to fit with the 50% divorce rate in the US. However, if eHarmony rejects too many people, they might not be very profitable.

7 Comments | Leave a Comment..


If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
 

Reader Comments (rss)

(Flattened / Threaded)

  1.  

    exclusivity...

    icon
    Mike (profile), May 27th, 2004 @ 11:49pm

    However, if eHarmony rejects too many people, they might not be very profitable.

    Ah, but you forget, the value of a club increases with its level of exclusivity...

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  2.  

    Math is consistent

    identicon
    dorpus, May 28th, 2004 @ 10:37am

    Most of the divorces in the US are done by a minority crowd of repeat-divorcers. Even if over 50% of all marriages end in divorce, over 50% of all people do have life-long marriages.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  3.  

    Marriage failures

    identicon
    Too many years from my statistics course, Jun 1st, 2004 @ 2:53am

    So one in five is not of "marriage type" (rename them DIV). Which means that 80 % of people should be marriage types (rename this group MAR). And there are two people in marriage.

    If we assume that only MAR-MAR marrgiage lasts and MAR-DIV, DIV-MAR, and DIV-DIV marriages end in divorces... and some make some other random marriage assumptions (being MAR or DIV type does not affect your decision to marry, or the selection of your spouse is not dependent of her/his/your type), doesn't this then mean that 64 % of the marriages last... statistically :-)

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  4.  

    Re: Marriage failures

    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Aug 8th, 2005 @ 6:49pm

    Those sound like Hardy-Weinberg conditions. You could do it that way and get 64% too.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  5.  

    Re: Marriage failures

    identicon
    Wizard Prang, Feb 10th, 2006 @ 7:33am

    Your statistic is skewed by the fact that those who divorce will often remarry... and re-divorce.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  6.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward, Jul 6th, 2007 @ 3:14pm

    the divorce rate is not directly related to eharmonys rejection rate.

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]

  7.  
    identicon
    Anonymous Coward 2, Jan 15th, 2008 @ 8:02pm

    Just because 2 people are the marrying type doesn't mean that their relationship would last. I think I would be more likely to join eHarmony because they do reject people that aren't the "marrying type."

    reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]


Add Your Comment

Have a Techdirt Account? Sign in now. Want one? Register here
Get Techdirt’s Daily Email
Save me a cookie
  • Note: A CRLF will be replaced by a break tag (<br>), all other allowable HTML will remain intact
  • Allowed HTML Tags: <b> <i> <a> <em> <br> <strong> <blockquote> <hr> <tt>


A word from our Sponsors...
Follow Techdirt
Flattr rss rss
From the Techdirt Archive...
A word from our Sponsors...

Close

Email This