Australian Supreme Court Says It Has Jurisdiction Over A New Jersey Server
from the jurisdiction-rears-its-ugly-head...-again dept
It seems the issue of legal jurisdiction and the internet is appearing once again. A defamation suit against Dow Jones is going to proceed in Australia, despite the story being published on a website in New Jersey. Dow Jones has argued that the case should be tried in the US, seeing as how they published the article in the US. However, the Australian Supreme Court says that since the artice was available on the web in Australia, it's as if they had published it in Australia as well. This question of internet jurisdiction keeps coming up, and I'd say this is a terrible ruling. It means that, technically, anyone who publishes anything on the internet could face charges anywhere in the world. If people followed that, it would be nearly impossible to publish anything online.






Reader Comments (rss)
(Flattened / Threaded)
Hey, the US is doing it to Russia...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Hey, the US is doing it to Russia...
It seems that all countries seem to want to believe that the laws of their own country apply to the internet as a whole. That's a recipe for disaster (or a reason to head back to law school).
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
silly...
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
This is a defamation case
This was a defamation case, as such the claimant must prove his reputation was damaged (and that the damage has cost them).
The news item was viewable in Australia and Australia is where the claimant has a reputation to be damaged (not in the US).
So if you are going to publish on-line content about Australians' then you should ensure that it is factual and legal (in Australia).
[ reply to this | link to this | view in thread ]
Add Your Comment