What's the point of protecting the trademark on one of the most hated franchises ever?
It's not Turkey that's bad, it's their government.
Oh no, my blog is hosted on blogspot! Oh wait... I rarely ever write blog posts on it anyways.
The MAFIAA has already been planting fake evidence of copyright infringement. I have absolutely no doubt that they would resort to such a tactic.
Just like a time-travel story arc in Bob & George!
Now, if those people had their twitter timelines set to private, then they might have a case.
Its unfortunate how frequently judges ignore established laws and procedures in favor of their own personal beliefs and opinions.
I'd say the $300 is a reasonable fine. The goal of most punishments is to teach the person a lesson in order to prevent them from committing the crime again.
The fines we have in the US? If I'm correct in assuming that the fines are all paid to the copyright holders, then the heavy fines we have are little more than a money-making scheme that the MAFIAA got through heavy lobbying/bribing.
And I wonder... how much of those heavy fines do the artists get to see? Or does 99% of it all go to what I am assuming is the MAFIAA's gold-plated money vault?
Argumentum ad Stupidus?
Knowing the way SCO operates, it is more than likely they would try to do some legal weaseling to get out of it.
Okay, somebody contact a priest and get some holy water to throw onto SCO's walking corpse. Each splash of holy water does 1d6 damage and dissolves undead targets as if it were acid.
"Hindsight is always 20/20."
Except when you are blind to the lessons of the past, as the owners of T&J apparently are.
This suddenly reminds me of a law that George W Bush had snuck into a bill that would make it illegal to be annoying online. Since anything and everything can annoy someone, you can easily see the stupidity of the law. As if we'd expect anything smart to come from Dubya's head.
This law is arguable worse, though, because a person can just SAY that they are humiliated or embarrassed in order to get someone thrown in jail out of spite.
A lot of companies these days seem to use the practice of "shoot first, ask questions later" when it comes to filing lawsuits. And they're learning the same lesson that Creative Lab has learned: think about the consequences before you litigate.
Some lawyers may be upset with the above statement, but only because they benefit from such behavior.
I should point out that DNA recognition technology is not as foolproof as it is depicted in crime dramas like CSI and Law & Order. Running DNA tests is also expensive, from what I heard.