It does clearly violate Sec. 230 of the CDA, in that the section provides intermediary immunity. But just because it violates Sec. 230 of the CDA doesn't make it unconstitutional... Just wondering if that word was used in the title superfluously or for a reason?
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by yosuuuup.
Re:
It does clearly violate Sec. 230 of the CDA, in that the section provides intermediary immunity. But just because it violates Sec. 230 of the CDA doesn't make it unconstitutional... Just wondering if that word was used in the title superfluously or for a reason?