Let me add. I really don't think that any judge is going to let plaintiffs do this very often. After all, they wasted the courts time too. So he/she must have done a damn good job convincing a judge of the merits of his/her argument.
Man. I am really torn here. I don't like absolutes that leave no discretion. It leads to insanely stupid execution of policies.
The classic example is the zero tolerance of drugs/weapons policy in schools that cause them to blow misunderstandings and mistakes out of proportion. Or the mandatory sentencing laws that force judges that hand out sentences that don't come close to matching the circumstances of the case.
We have to trust judges. If a judge felt that this case was enough of a mistake that it should not appear in the records, then I feel he needs to have the discretion to purge it.
What should be examined here is the process that is used to purge this case. Was the defendant notified? Was he/she allowed to contest the judge's decision? If all three parties are cool with it, then let them do it.
I think a good balance would be: (a) Approval of defendants (b) Automatic review of decision by that judges superiors
I suspect that they aren't wrong about damage to their equipment. It is well known that gangs control access to phones in many prisons and jails. So in addition to paying off the prison itself for a contract, I suspect that this company also has to pay extortion to the gangs that control the access. Otherwise, their equipment will get damaged in an "unfortunate accident". Nor will they have access to their customers.
Reducing the rates this drastically won't allow them to continue to pay the current extortion rates.
It could be that when Netflix license content, they are required to report back to the content holder the number of viewers on the content. The license could be structured that the content holder gets paid different different amounts when the views crosses predefined thresholds.
This would incentivize content creators to produce shows that people want to watch.
It would also let a content owner figure out what the content is worth. When the license expires, they could use that information to decide what to price the next license agreement at.
What is different here from the networks is that Netflix needs stats for content owners, not advertisers. The content owners don't care about the demographics. Or at least they don't have to have that info like an advertiser would.
In my state (Cal), and I suspect most states, there is a state government level department who audits and regulates meters. I see their inspection stickers on the gas pumps and the scales at the grocery store. They even have a website: https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/dms/
If a business chooses to sell their product by some unit of measurement, then they should fall under the jurisdiction of this department.
When AT&T sells me mobile service by the Gigabit, why can't I demand that my state audit AT&T to assure that they are measuring the bits correctly?
When Cox/Comcast/TWC implement datacaps, why can't I check with the CDFA to assure that their meter is correct?
I suspect the sad truth is that somehow Telcos and ISP's have managed to get themselves exempted from regulation.
That cover letter is a computer print out. That means he used some sort of editor. Why didn't he run the spell and grammar check before hitting "Print"? At least he would't appear to be a 8 year old turning in his first English assignment.
Here is an idea that might help the TSA. Stop with the mission creep. Focus on doing one thing, and one thing well.
Specially, why is the TSA now involved in drug interdiction and money laundering screening. Even their own blog boasts of finding pot, coke, bongs, etc. I've read many stories of TSA agents questioning people who are carrying cash, or seizing it.
So we now have a bunch of illiterate high school dropouts acting as sworn law enforcement officers.
I don't care that a fellow passenger might have coke in his bag. Or is carrying $15K in $100 notes. And they TSA shouldn't either.
By limiting the scope of their job to keeping weapons off of airplanes, and NOTHING more, then they might actually get a little better at it.
Sorry Cable. They don't seem the realize that the explosion of the student loan industry in the last 10 years has burdened their future customers with debts that will go on for 20 years. If they can even afford to have children, there won't be room in the budget for $150 a month of crap via cable.