The word is "flauting."
"They should fire every web designer they have and start over with the understanding that the entire Internet is based on text."
I guarantee you that the designers don't like it any more than you do.
This is what happens when people who don't know anything about the web are put in charge of making website decisions.
It's strange that Cushing doesn't point out (that I saw, anyway) that St. Felix is making 2 suggestions that can't work together.
1) Allow people to use songs in their videos as they wish, and
2) Lock down language so that the first to use a word makes money on it.
Either you want the freedom and cultural enrichment that comes with sane IP laws, or you want everyone to pay for everything they say, tweet, or use in a video.
St. Felix can't have it both ways.
As others have pointed out, it's hard to get really upset about this considering the age of consent in many states is 16.
Conduct unbecoming? Absolutely.
Lost job? Absolutely.
Is the guy a slimeball? Absolutely.
Jail time? That's a stretch.
I watch football every weekend, but would happily get rid of ESPN even it only saved me a negligible amount.
I watch games at the local bar, as god intended. ESPN deserves none of my money.
"So I watch most online video in SD, unless it's something where there are smaller details that are part of the plot"
This may shock you, but not everyone watches video solely for entertainment. If you need a screencast (which makes up about 50% of my online video viewing), 480p vs. 720p is the difference between a blurry mess and readable text.
I believe that the FBI should immediately begin using Chaum's awesome new security tool. I'm sure it's totally unhackable and does exactly what he claims, and what better way to test it than in a real world scenario?
I, on the other hand, will stick with real encryption.
'“It’s like if you found the front door of a house unlocked and someone decided to go into the house and take things that didn’t belong to them.”'
That's not at all what it sounds like, based on the reports I've read. (And I don't care at all about either candidate.)
Here's a better analogy:
You (Sanders) and your neighbor (Clinton) live in a duplex that shares a front door to an antechamber that houses the doors to both of your abodes. You find that the front door lock is broken, so you test the front doors to your and your neighbors house in order to assess the extent to which everyone's security has been compromised. You find that the locks on all 3 doors are broken, so you report it to your landlord (Schultz).
And then your landlord gets pissed at you, locks you into your house, and throws away the key.
In your previous article about this, you called him "Tom Bridis." Now in this article, you call him "Ted Birdis."
THE GUY'S NAME IS TED BRIDIS!!!
It's almost like someone at Techdirt doesn't want these articles to come up when you google the correct name.
To quote another proud television Marine:
"SURPRISE, SURPRISE, SURPRISE!"
http://www.detroityes.com/mb/attachment.php?attachmentid=3040&stc=1&d=1252785821
If you want some of my money, put your shows and movies on Netflix. Hell, offer Netflix Premium and triple the price if you want -- I'll happily pay it. Otherwise you get nothing.
Because 100% of what I watch that's not on Netflix I get using ... umm ... alternative methods.
Remember when Congress needed to protect Big Internet from net neutrality because the series of tubes were getting clogged?
I'm shocked to hear that that was all bullshit. /s
"2. The Parties also acknowledge the importance of informational materials, such as publicly accessible databases of registered intellectual property rights that assist in the identification of subject matter that has fallen into the public domain."
Things don't "fall" into the public domain; they are *elevated to* the public domain.
#titlegore
"Trademark is for a lot of things (not it isn't), but one of the things it is definitely not for is for jilted ex-business contacts to fight with 3rd parties because they are butt-hurt about not being able to pay the rent."
This sentence is so packed with errors and nonsensical that I wonder if it's a result of round-tripping with an automatic translator.
It would be great to treat intellectual property the same as physical property.
That would mean that, if you want to retain ownership, you'd have to pay periodic taxes on your works. Failure to do so means losing ownership to the government.
It's not unlike my favorite solution to the IP fiasco: Charge people $100 every 10 years for copyright renewal. Those works that don't get paid for are released into the public domain.
You're forgetting the millions being made on merchandising and all the inevitable spin-offs that accompany a successful game launch.
Like movies, the game itself often isn't the primary money-maker.
Re: Re: [8 minutes before *warm up*]
There seems to be a lot more people than I'd expect for a local soccer team.