(B) a copy or phonorecord of the work can be obtained at a reasonable price;
The 'moron' part was completely uncalled for, though.
I think less important than the number of EO's are the subject and scope. I don't have time to research this right now, but I think that kind of analysis would be very interesting.
'it seems worth nothing' or 'it seems worth noting'? With all the secrecy, their denials might be considered worth nothing, but I think you meant the latter.
How about this one? It was a toy sword. http://www.rawstory.com/2014/11/no-charges-for-utah-cops-who-shot-man-holding-cosplay-sword-six-times-in-back/
I think your issue is you insist on defining a backdoor as immediate access, and almost no one else does. You can argue with people forever if you redefine the terms to suit yourself.
My definition of backdoor is a ham sandwich. The FBI is absolutely not asking Apple for a ham sandwich.
So now... Happy Birthday is not in the public domain AND there is no way to license its use? Does this mean lawyers are going to argue against including it at all?
Dammit! I saw "acquired the rights" and "drug" and I completely missed the not patented part. So, is something preventing a generic company from coming in and offering it? And what are the rights that were acquired? Is this now trademark law that is killing people?
Remember kids, patents kill!
So a law that was designed to protect children from adults should be used by adults to hurt children? Because "the law is the law"? Every time I hear about one of these cases it infuriates me. It's just so painfully stupid. To those involved with bringing charges: Stop wasting resources ruining kids' lives, and go do something productive.
And the newspaper? I want to punch that writer and his editor in the nose. Exceptionally irresponsible 'journalism'.
I know, right? It's just an execution, unilaterally decided with no trial, evidence, or legal justification. Why would this require more than mild disapproval?
At some point one of our trolls will confuse sites and post here using the nick "wtf15604". No?
whose hand was shoved so far up Hood's behind that it was a bit unseemly.
You're late. This story's been up for an hour already.
They are under separate roofs, but the buildings all share walls with big holes in them so they can scratch each others' backs. Or something. Maybe it's a communal sink. Now I'm confused.
Well actually: the DoJ is Executive. Easy mistake, though, as they like to pretend they are Judge, Jury, and Executioner.
“I’ll always be open, but we’ve just been jerked around here too much,” Hatch said. “I expect people to live their word just like I do.”
I'm no expert. I'm probably the least mathematically savvy guy in this room, maybe. But, there are a lot of great minds in the United States. I'm trying to figure out a way to balance the interests here. So I would say to the math community, let's get the best minds in the United States on this. We can balance the interests here. We can somehow find a way to apply Pythagoras's Theorem selectively. We can't handicap our law enforcement by requiring them to work with the assumption that a^2 + b^2 *always* equals c^2 in right triangles. Do you want ISIS on your front lawn! THAT'S what were talking about here!
Re: Hijacking your name
Dictionaries will always lag behind actual English meaning. Dictionaries describe how words are used, they don't prescribe how we must use them. As long as the meaning behind the statement is understood by a majority of the audience, the word used is correct. You might successfully argue that a different word would be portray the intended meaning to larger percentage of readers, but that doesn't mean the original choice was wrong, only that it was less clear.