I don't agree with Gaye Estate's or the law suit but.. Mike, you say "they certainly sound quite different"
No actually they sound very, very similar. I know that's not the point legaly but if you play both together at the same time (soundcloud won't let you - I downloaded both and played them through DJ mixing software) they match perfectly.
Bass rhythm, overall key, voice - in pitch and overall style, quick rapid short chord changes that match in key and changes. Even the the mid-range organ bassline matches, in timbre, sound and rhythm.
The two tunes played together overall sounds like that rare two records that are a mix DJ's dream - It's like they were designed to be play at the same time.
Now before you all jump down my throat, remember I'm not on Gaye Estate's side in anyway. I'm just being objective ( I am a musician) but the fact is Blurred Lines is pretty much based on Got to Give it Up.
I'm not saying it's wrong. But to say "they certainly sound quite different" is certainly wrong.
You can pretty much guarantee that BBC show aired in the US will be cut, because in the UK the BBC's channels have no ads. So each program is generally 30 or 60 minutes (give or take a minute or so to introduce the next program, or announce a future BBC program)so because BBC America shows commercial ads it means the program wont fit - so they cut it. Every minute of ads on BBC America is a minute cut from the original episode. I would guess about 10-15 mins every hour?
Strange how the Gov.uk quoted seizure of "Coolex screenwash" doesn't seem to exist. Google it. There is nothing. The first hits are Gov.uk and then Techdirt. It doesn't exist.
Indeed. Karl used Gigaom as an example but to comment on there the first options - in order - are Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, WordPress and then Gigaom. And then as guest.
Your left mate. Come on, Left Shark is a legend. The "other" shark, the guy that actually did the dancing right is a loser. Kinda fucked up situation.
I tried to "shake it off" to both Perry and Swift, it just wasn't working for me. Perhaps we need a Left Shark, Perry, Swift threesome
A good example is The MailOnline. Paul Dacre's horrible but strangely addictive Conservative - borderline racist cum soft-porn exercise in hypocrisy. It's the online paper everyone loves to hate but it's also the most viewed online paper in the world. I think the main reason for this is the reality open comment policy. Some pieces are openly moderated (personally I think they all are..but) My point is.. the news sucks. It really is bad, but the genius behind The Daily Mail is the comment system. Very simple - they allow all comments (as long as it doesn't go against the DM agenda at the time) and they just let the readers just fight it out - with a very clever "vote up - vote - down" It really is horrible, sometimes I feel ashamed to be a reader. But from an online business point of view, they really have it nailed down.
The model designer Fernando Sosa complied with the Shapeways cease and desist and is no longer selling it but he then uploaded the model file to Thingiverse available to download for free. Good for him.
http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:667127
A good start would be taking a look a Chris Dodd`s $3.3 million a year pay cheque.
They already have the mainstream media and press for that.
In the UK they wouldn't dare. The serious papers have a hell of a lot of power, as much as in get the right papers on your side - you win the election.
Please stop saying that the FCC has any real relevance outside the US. Nobody else gives a shit.
Asshole, yes. Terrorist, no.
As someone who has built a not insubstantial criminal enterprise utilising the Post Office network - you know, letters and stuff. I say down with this TOR net web stuff.
Standard procedure in the UK. No insurance they impound it. Don't pay up within a given time the car gets crushed.
Dodd stands-up for whatever he's paid to stand-up for.
Frequently using repetition in sentences? Solution there, stop repeating yourself.
Not moronic just greedy.
Re: Re:
Are you saying that on BBC America the very first airing has no ad interruptions but later they do? I ask because in the UK The BBC's channels are completely ad free (everybody has to pay a licence fee) so programs originally aired in the UK tend to be 30 or 60 mins long - so they must have to cut them down to fit each hours adds in?