As someone who uses a VPN to get around restrictions I concur. The others will either learn how to use them or pull the law down. Thad, I usually agree with you and vote your comments insightful. I don't think it's right to disrespect you so today I most respectfully disagree with you on this issue. A short sharp shock is required to show the fools the error of their ways and to mobilise the public into holding their representatives accountable. For the most part, they're ignorant of how things work and aren't interested in learning more about it. If nothing else, this will be a remedy for that. Cut it off and let the screaming begin.
Gary, I don't have the resources to sue anyone for lying about me in this country, forget the foreign ones. Better to present your case as fully and completely to the platform mods and ask them politely to remove false claims than to go legal.
*What do you say to a business that was destroyed by a Russian blackmailer, say a pediatrician who was called a pedophile on "angry review" websites, who can't even sue the search engines that point people to those reviews? I'm told Section 230 harms no innocents. Another person said most online reputations are deserved.* Say what now? The legitimate, non-scammy review websites take down troll posts if you can prove that the posts were made by trolls, as I did. Search engines taking links down wouldn't have sorted that out. It's up to the platform hosting those posts to take them down as they have access to the back office to do so. Whether they will do it for free or not is another matter. The scammy ones like ROR won't. Trustworthy ones like Yelp will.
I've forgotten. /sarc
Actually, in the UK they're the kingmakers. They have such a massive influence over public opinion that if they back a particular politician, that politician's career takes off. https://sociologytwynham.com/2013/10/18/sun-headlines-and-their-political-influence/ If they don't... https://i.guim.co.uk/img/static/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2013/10/4/1380906799178/The-Sun-If-Kinnock-wins-t-001.jpg Think about what would happen to Jacob Rees-Mogg if the papers ignored him as an irrelevant back-bencher. The fact that they don't is why we all know his name.
And the tabloid owners are the biggest Tory party donors. Just a coincidence, I'm sure.
Douchebaggery passes are bi-partisan, David. Democrats will give their guy a pass if he moves their agenda forward, and anyone victimised by their guy will be merrily flung beneath a passing bus. Republicans will give their guy a pass if he moves their agenda forward, and anyone victimised by their guy will be merrily flung beneath a passing bus. What goes around comes around. People who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it, as we keep seeing over and over and over again.
I understand Mel Brooks is directing it.
Manning and Assange revealed crimes against humanity. Manning's trial was not fair and Assange's treatment by American courts won't be, either. Revealing government malfeasance doesn't tend to go down well.
I bet they would have, given the indictment. Hacking is a different thing, I agree with you there.
If you go back far enough we're all invaders from Africa. FIFY
Can we please stop calling them "conservatives?" They're not conserving anything, they abandoned traditional values a long time ago and they're only interested in money and power. They're right wing nut jobs.
McKinnon and O'Dwyer dared to violate the holy copyright (amen). Assange is a git but he's a git who helped expose the murder of innocents. If the hacking (however easy) charge is valid, fair enough, but are they really going to use hacking as an excuse to lock him up for exposing the atrocities?
Confirmed correct. Assange will be railroaded even though everyone knows it's a stitch-up.
We totally can elect our lawmakers; we directly elect our MEPs, at least in Britain and Ireland.
I'm doing that already. We've lost confidence in our glorious leaders because they keep on putting idiots in charge of things on the grounds that they do as they're told.
Re: Re: Re: Re:
AC, that's probably what this law is really about. Social media would effectively shut down if it was implemented.