"In addition, the punishment (in some cases, the loss of internet service) seems to greatly outweigh the crime."
Should be rewritten as "...seems to greatly outweigh the crime, or lack thereof."
There is no "crime" being committed because it is all based on accusations, there is no proof, and there is no process of law in which a court finds you guilty.
Well actually, this mod is for players who actually legally purchased the game, at least for now. Since without going online, you can't save your game.
Too bad the Catholic church is anti-gay. They'd never go for it.
It probably got through due to little to no oversight in the EU patent application process, similar to the broad patents handed out in the US that clearly shouldn't be patented.
I don't know enough about EU copyright/patent law to know if or how it can be busted.
I disagree. Patents and Copyright needs to be transferable under the current system so it can be used by those who would actually use it rather than be locked up for 100+ years without anyone being able to use it. Though, I suppose licenses could be used, but that would have it's own slew of problems as well.
They circumvented it with subtle word play.
Here's an excerpt from the article you must have missed: "Moreover, it is of course implemented in software; given that Article 52 of the European Patent Convention explicitly excludes "programs for computers" from patentability, the fact that the EPO granted a patent here is an early example of how it circumvented that exclusion because a computer was used to run that software (well, doh.)"
"Help help! This 7 year old was threatening me with a pastry! I think he means to kill us all!"
While this is true, don't forget that having to wait for a server to open up ontop of always on DRM wasn't known to the public before it's release. So I feel they have a right to complain about that.
So... are we sure this isn't just a case of a hacked email account? Because this shit is just too funny to be true.
After reading that I still don't understand what he wants to sue popehat for. If he doesn't care about the supposed "inaccuracies" then what? I'm just so confused... Though apparently not as much as the zoo keeper!
New google germany searche results
-THE
-THE
-THE
-VOLCANO
-MURDER
-HOMICIDE
-AN
-MURDER
-THE
-WHEN
-HOW
-MURDER
They'd have to do it the old fashioned way.
Ninja assassins.
It's too bad it takes big scandals and big news like this one to point out how bad for-profit prisons are :(
Wow trademark law is silly. "We have the domain name python.co.uk, therefore we own the trademark on EVERYTHING PYTHON!"
Also he skipped this really popular question
"The world spent $1735 billion on war in 2012, it would take $135 billion to totally eradicate poverty. NASAs budget is around half a penny of an individual persons tax dollar Why do we spend so much in war and so little in education and exploration?"
drnickphd, Geelong,Australia
I was really disappointed he skipped my question on the revolving door between Lobbyist and Legislators :(
Ah, don't know how I missed those. Sorry for doubting you.
Well, it's a step in the right direction I suppose.