"... the only place you feel showing more hostility towards you..." How 'bout those Canadians, eh? The only country where I've been "taken to the little room" to explain why I needed to enter the country.
"... a gun that can shoot 2-3 rounds before it fails..." That's always the first thing I picture -- the moment you detonate a small explosive charge inside a sculpted lump of UV-cured resin. Run away... run very, very far away.
"...before that, Congress should start to do its damn job and..." (fill in the blank) Did you really want to start making that list?
Now can we re-run the test, using photos of Cabinet Secretaries and Presidential Advisors?
Side wagers, anyone?
Maybe if the /s sarcasm flag was more like a 30-foot-wide flaming banner, we wouldn't miss these cues...
Makes more than a little sense to me. If you've got capital assets and need to stay in the know, paying progressively more for the Financial Times, even on a minute-by-minute basis, is offset by the ever-increasing returns you're getting on your investments, thanks to your jacked-up subscription.
Using that logic, I'm going to try subscribing to the Po' Folks' Times (much more up my alley), and see if the subscription price continually drops until they're sending me a sack of cash every month.
This wacky "Inspector General" snowflake is clearly not aligned with the Administration's narrative. Play with the team or hit the road, buddy... we've got a nice desk waiting for you in the FOIA section.
"... exploiting the FCC's trusted logo..."
Somehow, I'm not feelin' the trust. Trust would happen after you made it unlawful for a cable company to charge me $12/mo extra for a device that simply allows me to consume the seller's service.
"...causing tremendous challenges to legacy broadcasters..."
Ironically, technology advances have lowered the cost of broadcast hardware by orders of magnitude; a $50,000 camera of 15 years ago is easily replaced, at higher quality, with a $5,000 camera today. And idiot-proofed, automated applications mean a small, community-based station can be run with a fraction of the staff... and capital... previously required.
Of course, the same economies that democratize hyperlocal broadcasting are the ones which turn multiple station ownership into a modern-day gold rush; a single regional playout server sends identical, pre-recorded programming to ten markets as cheaply as one.
This is mostly about the (imagined) right to generate massive revenues by shedding those old-fashioned notions of benefiting the community.
"'Anyone think that's a bit rank?', the Beertown post said."
I'm thinking "daft" plus "rank", which, according to my math, equals "dank".
Not to pick nits, but it's not really "How Microsoft Convinced Clueless Judges..."; we don't get a peek at a brilliant MS strategy that delivered injustice. Instead, it's about clueless judges, a bogus expert, and plenty of misrepresentation; these are fairly standard fare for an infringement case like this. If we could really get to the how part, maybe there would be lessons as to how to defend/protect against this idiocy. (Although skipping the Microsoft/Dell logos would have been a good start.)
Picturing a "fast lane", quick-service cashier window in Marsha Blackburn's congressional office... lobbyists with cash in hand can leapfrog that pesky "competitive marketplace" nonsense.
Have you seen Michael Cohen's photo side-by-side with Naruto's? Hmmm?
I believe the response is this: What is it about the ability to bottle nicely-balanced Pinot Noir that would make you say, "Now that's the kind of construction company I need to build my new garage." Customer confusion, the ultimate arbiter, generally requires both entities to play in the same space.
In other news, Titanic passengers are issued Dixie cups to help bail out the boat in case of leaks.
I once ordered a bowl of anomalie du jour... and dat's defact-o.
This lawsuit has no teeth.
There's an underlying issue here: in this story, "broadband" means mobile broadband, but in many contexts, it's used as a surrogate for wired broadband... high-speed household connections for multiple users. There's a big difference. Considering wireless broadband pricing schemes, it's no substitute for underserved low-to-moderate income customers.
Or the entire sitcom "Mrs. Brown's Boys". All the lads would be in the feckin' hoosegow.
Not sure why I'm even looking for plausibility, but really, what's the motivation for a CIO to cry DDOS? Site crashes under load due to unanticipated public response -- doesn't sound like a hangin' crime to me.
This clearly comes from the top; and even if it didn't, accountability rests there regardless.