If the case was started while she was alive* and then dropped simply because she is dead, that could establish de facto precedent.
*I say alive only because, it was never proven that she was or was not alive, or that she was dead for that matter. For all we know she could have moved after receiving a foreclosure notice.
Jails are not 'overcrowded' everywhere. One solution could be a system whereby states traded jail space on a sort of exchange or market.
That way states like Utah or Wyoming could 'sell' jail space to places like California.
Many criminals want to be in jail after they get out because at least in jail they get a square meal three times a day and free medical care. Also, they aren't subject to the temptations to commit crimes that they are outside of prison.
It's part of the agenda along with activist judges designed to subvert the rule of law in this country.
Apparently now, according to Techdirt editorial cabal, that it's okay to commit a crime, as long as you are dead.
You seem to all be lawyers here at Techdirt, but now you've obviously seen fit to add physician to your schtick as well.
How do you know for a fact that this 'grandmother' was dead?
If the infringement happened while she was still alive then it makes legal sense to continue the case. If precedent is allowed to be established, simply because someone died, then how would that serve the public interest?
I have to agree. Crime has not risen substantially during this recession in large part due to the criminal elements in our society already being locked up.
Normally, these would be the first to become unemployed and unemployable, and the first to start breaking the law when times are tough.
It makes sense to fill our jails to capacity with as many criminals as possible. Then if we run out of room, we can always let certain ones out on parole.
Seems like you have some sort axe to grind with law enforcement outside this specific issue.
I'm curious, do you have a police record?
Look, we can talk precedent and hurl man-on-street cliche's til the cows come home, but until we take actions against decrepit senior citizen Judge-corpses wearing adult diapers, we will continue getting these crap rulings about the internetz.
"The employee, believing the e-mail to be genuine, informed her supervisor,"
If this is the type of critical thinking individual Morgan Stanley employs, then I would suggest placing your money elsewhere.
Prohibit all cayenne sales in the United States! Some people don't like spicy food!
I think strong case could be made that the prohibition be based on their obvious banal derivative nature.
Is this the 'Arab Street' of blogs?
The Problem with Buddhist Philosophy and Free Market Capitalism, is that you have to wait for these things to happen.
Given enough time and monkeys, anything could happen, the trick is making it happen now.
They should rename it the Hitler Channel.
Look I'm all about Hitler specila, but enough is enough, how many Hitler retrospectives can one channel possibly produce? What about all the other mass murder war mongers, like the Bush family for instance?
Will this stop Libertarian Christian nut bags from quoting an avowed atheist as Free Market scripture?*
In the same sense, all the Limbaugh-Beck drone units are now telling us that the bank bailouts were not capitalism. So in effect, according to Rand, who died for our capitalist sins, we are absolved from the sin of TARP, which was caused by a sodomite Senator anyway. I mean nobody is perfect right?
So long and thanks for the worthless apology...without any punishment to deter them, the doctrine of Industry Self Regulation will mean many more TARPs and too-big-to-fails to come.
(*Greenspan was at one point an Ayn Rand disciple...for all you home skoolers out there)
Anyway, the point is, after the complete failure of "self regulation" and freeing market forces for the magical invisible hand, we got the world's largest financial crisis to date. Will Objectivists, Libertarians, and Bible Thumpers check theirs?
Part of the Jesus cult mentality is that everything has to have consequences* even if they don't. So for cases where there are none, they set about creating some.
(*except big banks and CEO's because they create jobs and are doing god's work in other bigger more important ways)
That's why these nut bags hate the morning after pill.
woops! totally meant to post this on another topic.
Will this stop Libertarian Christian nut bags from quoting an avowed atheist as Free Market scripture?*
In the same sense, all the Limbaugh-Beck drone units are now telling us that the bank bailouts were not capitalism. So in effect, according to Rand, who died for our capitalist sins, we are absolved from the sin of TARP, which was caused by a sodomite Senator anyway. I mean nobody is perfect right?
So long and thanks for the worthless apology...without any punishment to deter them, the doctrine of Industry Self Regulation will mean many more TARPs and too-big-to-fails to come.
(*Greenspan was at one point an Ayn Rand disciple...for all you home skoolers out there)
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re:
thanks mike!
I completely agree. I for one want more people in jail where they can't hurt others or themselves.
Furthermore, jail can be an end in itself. For instance, if I place a murderer in jail, then I have stopped that murderer from murdering have I not. The amount of murders stopped is directly proportional to the amount of time a murder is in jail, with death being the point of diminishing return.
In the same way, the greater the quantity of copyright infringers in jail multiplied by the amount of time served will be directly proportional to the amount of pirated material available.