Or, alternately, let the entire EU figure out the same lesson Spain and Germany did.
"You don't like us advertising your publication for free? Fine, we'll stop. Oh? Your readership/linkrate just dropped into the floor? Ok, YOU PAY US for every link we make back to you now, or watch your smarter competitors buy what's left of you for a penny on the dollar at your bankruptcy sale."
An entire continent wants to become irrelevant?
Let them ...
Now knowing what to write on them is a different story, but the tech to re-write a mag-stripe has been around for decades. So, I can kind of see the judges point, that mag-stripe is not a fixed item. It's entirely possible, and probable, that somebody could emboss one number on the front, but the number that got submitted to commit fraud was different. How many sales clerks would notice the difference?
The people forging cards, even those that should have security chips, obviously have easy/cheap access to devices that can write what ever they want onto a cards mag-stripe.
Seriously? If it's useless without an internet connection and related services, why were you stupid enough to buy it for a critical part of your home automation system?
Convenience or Reliability, pick one.
If they've decided to re-visit that law, it's because they've found a way to make it worse.
Well, we let children inherit the copyright of their parents, so who in PETA wants to claim the monkey is their parent? :)
So the two books that show both sides of the insanity back then are now public domain. I'm looking forward to seeing somebody combine the two, stories from Frank, justification from Hitler, that show the link between what he believed and how those beliefs got used to justify what happened.
No, for the record, I've never read either book. But I don't remember ever seeing a better chance of the writings of two people from each end of the bell curve that was WW2 being publicly compared to each other.
It's even more insane that both had to be dead for 70 years before it might happen.
If Russia wants to disconnect from the rest of the planet, well, why not help them? Compile a list of every IP allocation going into Russia, block them from passing over the links into Russia, return the allocations to ARIN for reallocation.
They get their own Intranet, the rest of the planet gets large IP allocations back for use.
Win-Win :)
Has somebody created a form letter to send back to them, explaining that they've been caught violating federal law, but for a $20 payment (per violation) you'll consider not suing them? :)
I just pulled their plug this last week and switched to wireless, after yet another outage where the estimated repair time was three days. The fact that the problem wasn't even at my home, but at their equipment office, didn't matter, I couldn't break the script reader out of their loop.
A legal search engine is one where they have enough money and lawyers to tell you to go screw yourself when you mess with them. The illegal one returns the same results, but doesn't have any lawyers to defend their rights.
How does that saying go?
When your job is to make sure you have at least a vague excuse for doing something, you're not interested in the accuracy of your data?