No, it certainly is. Without her, we'd have never seen the dreck from after the first one. SHE TOTALLY RUINED IT FOR ME!!!!
Treaties do not work that way, at least in theory. The US would then be liable to all trade and economic sanctions listed in the treaty.
Would it be better if the US was labelled as "oligo-fascist"?
Because it's like quantum physics: either you don't know where you're going or you don't know how fast things are moving.
No, that's just innovating on the population.
There's a patent for that, I think.
[/bad-taste-bear]
No, but they damn well should be. If, as you consistently claim, we are all simply misinformed dolts, then having the negotiations in the open would prove your point.
However, seeing as these ones are happening in near-complete secrecy, I'd be more willing to assume the worst i.e. that they are mass-slaughtering Middle America's babies in their sleep whilst chanting the name of Azathoth so that they can cure the world of sanity.
That's in part because there is a fundamental disconnect between the real world and the digital world that some people either refuse to grasp, or simply cannot grasp. That's not always a flaw, though it is when it comes to IP.
To be fair, the public everywhere with stringent IP laws is getting screwed sixty different ways to Sunday.
Del Mad, bro?
No, it would be a wet haddock in a sock. Worn by Cartman.
How can you prove that I do not, in fact, exist?
What is being asked is that you can prove a negative.
Perhaps it isn't stored so that it can be easily recovered by anyone but Sparkfun.
'Cause the cops don't dance, and if they don't dance, then they're no friends of mine.
Why not? The major problems with Ip are economically-based, so it stands to reason that "enforcement" by governments is less economical than businesses adapting to the evolving marketplaces, which seem to change more drastically in developed and semi-developed economies.
All that is necessary for patents to win is for copyrights to do nothing.
Would you prefer ti if the same analysis came from a legal represwentative of the MPAA?
Because if so, that would make you a hypocrite.
Double "That other" before sources, first sentence, third non-quoted paragraph.