No problemo. They've probably found it's simpler to just use wiretap information for "parallel construction."
Remember, "It's not perjury if the prosecution does it!"
I am often amazed that they aren't selling more bodycams to citizens.Police-type cams are bulky and priced for "other people's money" budgets. I wear a "spy cam" type camera that looks like a fat pen. There are tie-tac-sized ones that will talk to a smartphone via Bluetooth. The problem with carrying a camera is that if it's identifiable as such, it's likely to be smashed or stolen during the encounter. One that streams video to a remote server will eat up your data plan. "You pays your money and you rolls your dice." Those of you who use phone apps to record audio; police are wising up to that, too. Don't be surprised if your phone gets stepped on or mysteriously reset to factory default while it's in their hands.
Lyrics go hand in hand with musical scores, and copyright enforcement goes way back.
"Happy Birthday to you!
If you sing this, we'll sue!
Because we own the copyright to
Happy Birthday to you!"
but it's full of ads that subsidize the price over time and create stable revenue for the manufacturers
Really? A thousand bucks' worth of viewer information per TV? A lot more, actually, when you deduct the ones in public areas and rooms with nobody watching them. For a TV that lasts, what, three or four years before it croaks or they buy a bigger one?
Also note the people who watch the most TV tend to be children, the elderly, and the poor; not exactly your top purchasing groups. So for a thousand dollars per TV, with maybe a quarter of TVs in view of anyone who might be a customer, that's about a thousand dollars' worth of marketing information per viewer per year.
I think that "thousand dollars per TV" is between two and three orders of magnitude larger than the actual marketing value of the information they might collect. It's a scare number to try to browbeat people into buying 1984-style TVs that watch them back, to make them stop complaining about it.
So... 9 years of domain seizings. The average Federal bureaucrat has 262 working days per year. That's 2,358 working days. That comes out to 424 domains seized per day. For an 8 hour working day, less breaks, checking email, meetings, and gossip, that's 6.5 working hours per day. (which is, incidentally, a very generous figure). 65.2 seizures per hour.
That comes out to seizure of one domain every minute or so.
My goodness, those are some busy little beavers, aren't they? I'm sure all proper diligence and paperwork are done for each seizure... and note time for reviews, follow-ups, and so forth aren't included.
The purpose isn't "accurate identification." It's to build up such a bulk of incriminating data that refuting it is pointless.
Think of the Stasi in the DDR. They knew that the majority of the information they had was either grossly inaccurate or outright faked, but it didn't matter; seeing the boxes full of documents, even people who knew better thought "there there's smoke there's fire." Which was the purpose of building those files in the first place.
or the fact that it's 91% minorities.
Given the demographic makeup of Chicago, there's nothing questionable about that.
Nah. It's just lazy police work. "Arrest them all and let the courts figure it out." Makes their stats look good even if the arrests turn out to be bogus.Appropriations, raises, and promotions for everyone!
So, what, Georgetown Center was just sitting on a pile of paper or keeping files secured on their server?
Why weren't the documents, scanned if necessary, uploaded to archive.org or one of the other (preferably non-US) archive sites? Or even a few torrents?
These Georgetown people don't sound like the sharpest sporks in the dishwasher.
Far too long of a string for most people to peck into their phone's pathetic web browser app.
Better than that; the second-most wanted terrorist in the world walks around with my face. Though we're (as far as I know) of completely different racial and national origin, the genetic dice rolled snake eyes. I'm the elder by about two months. It's MY face, dammit! Someday I'm going to walk into some airport or Federal building, the computers will go "TILT!", and jackbooted thugs will come swarming my way, thinking they have just made the arrest of their careers...
Flip side... once it's out of your hands and sight, they can put anything they want on there and then "discover" it for the record. Same with tablets, laptops, and other devices. Saves them the hassle of "finding" physical objects in your luggage.
Have any confidential government or business information with you? How about HIPAA data in the US, or the several categories of confidential data in the EU? Any business documents that are confidential or under nondisclosure?
What if the Fed leaves that information on an old hard drive that winds up on eBay? It has already happened a few times.
This is the same Swallwell who threatened to attack lawful American gun owners with nuclear weapons.
"Seems legit..."
typing "Thomas Goolnik" into:
BAIDU: two techdirt story hits midway on first page
YANDEX: second and third results are techdirt
BING: second result is techdirt article
There are other search engines than Google. Though most of the smaller ones are just front-ends for Google.
That sort of thing is usually handled by "fusion centers", which, being technically private organizations, gather and distribute intelligence to law enforcement.
Maybe ICE just want to cut out the middleman and root through the databases directly.
In the early 2000s there were still less than six major gateways from the USA to the rest of the world. Though most were privately owned, all the foreign access points and NAPs are under NSA control as part of their charter, plus the internet originated as part of the US national defense structure; being able to cut off outside attackers easily would be part of the original design.
Many smaller countries, all international phone and internet connections go through their Postal-Telegraph systems, sometimes with a single choke point.
Britain, Australia, and China already firewall themselves from the rest of the world, and Pakistan was working on it last I heard. Can't have evil foreign badthink contaminating the citizenry, you know.
If Russia can't cut itself off from the rest of the world and still operate, it should be able to; it's basic national security stuff. Flip it; what if the rest of the world cut Russia off? They still have to move data packets.
the government (not the victim) charges them with a crime,"And the value of the crime against you property is...?" Some jurisdictions won't even accept a mugging or burglary report unless you can prove - as in paper documents - damages of over $250. Which means petty criminals operate without restriction, but hey, it takes some load off the courts...
I am a lawyer, and I can't let this information out.
Do you use Microsoft Windows 7, 8, or 10 or any Apple computer product that's connected to the Internet?
Ever wonder what the encrypted "telemetry" and "customer assurance" data that they chatter continually back to the motherships might be?
> because Alex had just turned 19, and was no longer considered a minor,
---
Funny, in the rest of the country you're no longer a minor when you turn 18.
I didn't notice what his official immigration status was supposed to be. But he was a 19 year old adult, still going to high school, and apparently not real bright; with all the "gang" warnings, he should have known better than to vandalize school property with "the Honduras area code."
At 19 I'd been on my own for a year, a job, a car, and my own residence. I'm not feeling a whole lot of sympathy here.
In the USA, truth is considered an absolute defense against defamation.
In Britain and much of the Commonwealth (and Indonesia was once British) it doesn't work that way; even if the accusations are true, you can still sue for damages.