The Record Labels don't seem to understand that if I can see something on my computer the I can copy it.
It is, after all, my computer and it is under my control.
The simple solution; if you do not want content to be copied, do not post it on YouTube (or anywhere on the internet).
See how that works for your profits.
Well, kudos to the engineers, technologists, professors etc for trying to inject some reality into this one-sided hijacking.
Still, I feel that they are missing a small but important point. Chairman Pai's attack on Net Neutrality only applies to the USA, but the internet is a bit bigger than that. So it would be more correct to say that "The sort of rapid innovation the Internet has fueled for the past two decades would come to a sudden and disastrous halt" in the USA.
Look for rapid innovation to come from other countries that actually have competition within the ISP sector. Especially if innovation is stifled in the USA.
Perhaps rather than couch the argument against Pai in terms of creating an internet that limits developers and engineers, it would be better to argue that killing net Neutrality would cause the USA to lose its lead in development of new products and internet technology.
On a recent trip, I boarded a flight from Frankfurt International Airport.
After passing through security screening at Frankfurt, I noticed a shop selling nail scissors, clippers, manicure sets, and Swiss Army knives. These were all available to take on board international flights exiting Germany.
I asked the vendor about travel requirements for these items and was told that recent changes to regulations meant that knives with a blade length of under 6cm are now allowed on international flights.
Nice to see some countries toning down the terror-induced hysteria involved in air travel.
On the other hand, it is now quite easy to fly to the USA armed with a few Swiss Army knives. The 9/11 terrorists had carpet cutters. But, after you have hijacked a plane and crashed it into a building somewhere, your phone will be searched.
It is probably time that Google automatically included search results from other popular search engines into its own results. Like DuckDTuckGo and others do.
That way, any court that tries this trick will have to ask all search engines to comply with its order, or go pound sand.
Calls for Brexit were surely inflammatory content and would have been banned.
It is obvious that our glorious leaders just don't buy the "it can't be done" argument. Time for a new argument from the tech community.
I suggest this; There is no unbreakable encryption, the problem is encryption that takes 10 billion years to break using current technology. An obvious solution presents itself - make computers 100 billion times faster. Then encryption can be broken in a little over a month.
We need to call on governments to invest billions of dollars in basic research, so that we can make computers faster and fight terrorism!
This would have the advantages that it shifts the narrative into something our glorious leaders can understand ($$) and that more basic research tends to benefit everyone.
Omit to tell them that, when they actually develop the new quantum supercomputer, I will just add a couple of digits to my passwords and they will have to start all over again.
I would just like to point out that, because I live in regional Australia and have no other good option, I use satellite internet.
That means my IP address is shared with around 60,000 other users of that satellite. Troll that!
Would anyone from the UK who wishes to send me an email please deposit $7 into my PayPal account?
Thanks.
I'm curious what ISP Pai and O'Rielly use.
It is becoming an established principle of governance that the person in charge of regulating X should not have any experience of using X.
Impartiality perhaps?
The only way to hurt ISPs is to use tech to bypass them. That is, stop using an entrenched ISP to access the internet and go to a different technology.
That is how Uber upset the taxi cartels, and how AirBnb upset the Hotel industry.
Of course ISPs know this and are very frightened of it. That is why municipal broadband is so difficult to implement. Perhaps satellite internet is becoming a viable means of bypassing your ISP. Watch for laws banning unsightly dishes on rooftops.
mp3 alive and well, critical reporting may be on its last legs
...but, is pirated evidence admissible in court?
I hear there's a job opening at the Copyright Office...
For those of us who don't know how pencils and paper are made or used, the pencil and paper system is definitely not secure.
Bring back chisels and stone tablets.
If enough lawyers chip away at this wall for enough time, they will eventually reach the pile of gold on the other side.
Then you may need a DMV permit.
Clearly you own a vehicle "...that has the capability of operating or driving the vehicle without the active physical control or monitoring of a natural person...."
In my experience, the times I've been convinced to change my mind, or seen others change their minds, it tends to come when there are long drawn out conversations, exploring the issues in more depth -- with lots of back and forth.
Is it time to ban Twitter, because limiting comments to 140 characters leads to a lack of depth? (This comment is 140 characters in length).
Unfair Contracts?
Under Australian law, a standard form contract is deemed to hold unfair terms if;
- it would cause a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations arising out of the contract
- it is not reasonably necessary in order to protect the legitimate interests of the party who would be advantaged by the term; and
- it would cause detriment (whether financial or otherwise) to a party if it were to be applied or relied on.
Unfair terms in these contracts are deemed to be void.
I suspect that some other countries have similar provisions in contract law (Canada?, France?). I wonder if this will, in the longer terms, influence a move of research to jurisdictions that are more friendly to researcher rights?