Accordingly, I dissent, and I’m off to Costco to buy some food.
...did Judge Kozinski just admit that he's running off to do a drug deal?
The first thing you need to understand is that while Tesla sells different version of its Model S, with different ranges, the range is actually entirely software-dependent. That is, it uses the same batteries in different cars -- it just limits how much they'll charge via software.
So one's a Model S and one's a Model-less?
Compare this:
Domagalski, armed with facts, and the law...
to this:
Domagalski, armed, with facts, and the law...
Next Lesson: Effective Use of Bullet Points.
One license to rule them all,
one license to find them,
One license to bring them all
and in the darkness bind them.
As a side note, I'm still not entirely sure why Techdirt finds these stories of news sites closing off comments to be such a big deal. I know we're all big fans of free speech here, but doesn't that include the right to decide whether or not you publish comments on your website?TechDirt isn't reporting on the closing of the comments section (the "Tech") as much as they are reporting on the false narratives accompanying the closing of the comments (the "Dirt"). Here, the website claims:
[W]e will be working hard over the coming months to figure out how best to bring back debate to aljazeera.com.Why not figure it out before closing the comments, rather than months after (which most certainly will not happen)?
And yet they are out there trying to help people, and you are sitting around typing things.Said the AC sitting around typing things.
Spelling matters. Which makes me think of a TLDR for the post:
We don't want the military enforcing any ordinance and we don't want the police touching any ordnance.
Algorithymia: improper beating of the heart, whether irregular, too fast, or too slow, due to hacking of a pacemaker
Goldman also points out no serious person is likely to confuse a Zestimate with an appraisal… at least not if they expect to be taken seriously.
Without any context, "zestimate" sounds like a measure of how spicy something is, while "Scoville unit" sounds like a condo in suburban Chicago. Just don't combine the two.
Wait. Law enforcement in Houston needs surplus military equipment to rescue people?
No, they don't.
Last I've seen it's been tons of good hearted people using boats of all kinds going around and rescuing people. I don't see much need for military equipment.
What about...
There is a massive need for military equipment in Houston. Operated by the military. Not by law enforcement.
Cop: I was scared. Really scared. I deserve some QI. 8th: No, no you weren't. No QI for you. Cop: Now I'm scared. 8th: Yes. Yes you are. Of course, the victim hasn't won anything other than the right to try his case. He'll need a jury to decide against the cops as well. And even if he wins, his kids will never be able to unsee watching their dad being arrested for no reason.
Good thing that Obama's was the most transparent administration ever. Imagine how long they would have had to wait if the administration was trying not to be transparent.
...but someone needs to go check on Mike. I think he broke the Ctrl+B and Ctrl+I key combos on his computer pressing them so hard.
...the "good faith" exception is a euphemism for the "ends justifies the means" exception.
The government sets up a fake entity and nets only $1M in free gear but a citizen does the same and nets $11M in free gear?
The free market clearly is more efficient than the government at scamming the free government-surplus market.
Delay itself is a reason. The DOJ may hope that Wittes gives up. Most requesters do. And, even if DOJ ultimately has to give up the information, it will be so long after the original statement that it's no longer news.
Sherman burned all of them, right? Basically the same.No, Sherman marched from Atlanta to Savannah, burning a wide swath of Georgia. He then passed north through South Carolina and North Carolina on his way to Richmond, Virginia, passing well east of the tiny town of Charlotte.
With (next) friends like these, who needs enemies?
"[I]n certain limited circumstances, a nonparty may be bound by a judgment because she was adequately represented by someone with the same interests who was a party to the suit." Taylor v. Sturgell, 553 U.S. 880, 894 (2008) (citation, internal edits, and quotation marks omitted).
In addition, "a party bound by a judgment may not avoid its preclusive force by relitigating through a proxy. Preclusion is thus in order when a person who did not participate in litigation later brings suit as the designated representative or agent of a person who was a party to the prior adjudication." Id.
You don't get to sue as "next friend" and then say "oops, never mind, not really a friend" when you lose badly.