"Apple’s claim is particularly weak because it does not involve a person being compelled to speak publicly, but a for-profit corporation being asked to modify commercial software that will be seen only by Apple. There is reason to doubt that functional programming is even entitled to traditional speech protections"
Might as well use Citizens United in our favor. If it's good for the goose....
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Tbear.
since they are referencing previous scotus cases
"Apple’s claim is particularly weak because it does not involve a person being compelled to speak publicly, but a for-profit corporation being asked to modify commercial software that will be seen only by Apple. There is reason to doubt that functional programming is even entitled to traditional speech protections"
Might as well use Citizens United in our favor. If it's good for the goose....