Reporting can be criticism as well if it's not objectively neutral
Even if it is objectively neutral, it can constitute criticism. Simply setting forth the numbers on my property tax notices is criticism of our profligate officials.
hoping to get sued and then take the case to courtThey could be clever, and have a tame plaintiff sue them. They defend on the ground that the statute is unconstitutional, tame plaintiff confesses error, and there is case law against the viability of the statute.
"American" as in "Confederate States of America"Not really. What was an amendment in the U.S. Constitution was actually embedded in the Confederate Constitution: freedom of speech was deemed a core value. Sure, these core values were mainly for white property owning males. I believe that, while there may be
very fine people on both sides'', the general intent is to foster white supremacy andaryan'' purity. Obviously non-whites ought not vote; we see that being worked on in several states in the name of election security.
can you not sue the judge for aiding and abetting criminal acts by agents of the stateYou cannot successfully sue for anything done in their judicial capacities. They have absolute, as opposed to qualified, immunity.
The law didn’t cause the problem. The extreme overreaction by the officers did.The law was an essential element of the problem. Cops could not arrest for violation of the law were the law not in place. And with qualified immunity, the failure of the actual fact pattern to conform with the law is unlikely to produce consequences for the cops. Again, remember, this is Dade we are talking about.
the corrupt cops and giving them a swift boot out the door,Using the term
corrupt'' as I suspect you are, to identify cops who are unwilling to follow the law or the Constitution, the suggestion of giving them aswift boot'' may leave the police station empty. Well, there may be a secretary or two, but generally no cops.
Remember, this is Dade we are talking about.
The same is often done in contracts. You leave certain things flexible in order to
I think I explained once already:
What Google is getting is what we used to call a general warrant: give us info on everyone whose phone was in the area, whether or not they were actually in position to commit the act under investigation. That is not readily distinguished from the old general warrant to search everyone who passes by such a location.
only hope on that front is that Japan tells them to piss offProbably not the same Japan famous for pixellating the naughty bits even in porn.
people with stripes ARE pretty uncommonNot necessarily. It depends on the dungeons you frequent. However, according to the article, on E-Bay you will no longer be able to buy and sell pictures of them.
It appears that the State wants to officially stay out of the litigation, going so far as to only give standing to non-state employees. So, let us consider the possibilities.
Big Tex does something to fund an abortion, perhaps it is enough that buys a girl a train ticket over to a different state. Surely it would be enough to at least let someone consider suit.
Little Tex, a friend of Big Tex, sues. Big Tex defends on the ground that the statute is unconstitutional. Little Tex tells the court that, upon reflection, Big Tex appears correct, and they provide an agreed judgment to that effect, which the court accepts.
In such a case, the law appears unconstitutional. If Big and Little were imaginative, they might manage to get the case positioned so that it goes up on appeal, agree there, and have an appellate ruling to the desired effect.
So putting ten rounds in a 15-year-old who is throwing rocks at you is fine?Well, yes, that is what the US 9th Circuit is saying. It comes with some empty language deploring such things, but the actual decision is that this is fine. Also, it does not matter if the ``throwing rocks'' part is a post-hoc fabrication.
Yes, Nintendo has the legal right to do thisIt would be interesting to see some authority or explanation for this claim. Right now, it strikes me as being much along the lines of a book vendor telling me that I cannot have the radio playing music while I read.
in short “Notify the user who provided the content of the removal and explain the reason the content was removed” occur because rules aren't enforced evenly.They are not enforced evenly in my living room, either. In my living room (or on my web site), I get to make the decisions. They are probably not the same decisions Parler or Stormfront would make. If you want decisions compatible with Parler or Stormfront, then go to their living rooms.
A social media site with millions of users is not "your lawn" and you will never realistically own oneI also am unlikely to own the lawn of the Stetson mansion. That does not mean that the owner is under some special obligation to allow me to stand on his lawn and shout offensive propaganda.
Many school boards are extensions of county authority, not state.That sounds so very strange that I should like to hear of the state where this is the case. Certainly in Florida, which is the one with which I am most familiar, the school boards are creatures of the state, provided for in the state constitution, and having taxing authority independent of the counties. I have seen similar in several other states, and none where the counties have authority over the schools. In some cases the school board and county will agree to use the same district lines, but that is a choice the entities make at their option. As creatures of the state, rather than of the county, school boards in Florida have certain inherent powers and duties. DeSantis, though a goof, may find it difficult to overcome the constitutional autonomy of school boards in order to dictate local mask policy.
Why it wants to go to war with its own fans and customers in this way, meanwhile, has been an open question for years.
It is quite likely that Nintendo's fans and customers are masochists. They enjoy such treatment, and demonstrate it with further purchases.
These attorneys will now be paying the legal fees and costs incurred by the multiple Michigan government entities that were forced to defend themselves from this baseless lawsuit.
The interesting thing is that all the attorneys are on the hook here. From pg 109 of the order:
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ attorneys shall jointly and severally pay the fees and costs incurred by the State Defendants and the City of Detroit to defend this action.
So, until someone actually pays, they all have judgments against them. That has consequences, assuming always that the defendants properly record the judgment for fees.
I understand the King James version to be a derivative work, largely consisting of translated Greek (New Testament) and Hebrew (Old Testament) writings. So any copyright claimed by the crown might be subject to prior claims.
Time to Stop Paying Extra Taxes
Only if one maintains offices in those places around the world. Generally the US is relatively safe for most of this stuff.
If the video sharing service closes offices in India, it is no longer within the reach of Indian laws, even if it no longer has the opportunity to pay taxes to New Dehli. I suppose they could mail a check. Likewise for Brazil, Russia, Red China, Australia, and so many others of which we have read here in Techdirt.
Note that some services cannot be safely had from US vendors. For instance DNS service ought to be purchased abroad, lest the US govt decide to seize or transfer your domain for saying disapproved things.