It's safe to say both parties behaved like children in this incident. At some point in our lives every one of us has done something similar in life. now, can we all get over this and look at more important things?
You cannot use U.S. government trademarks or the logos of U.S. government agencies without permission. For example, you cannot use an agency logo or trademark on your social media page.
The first step should have been this little gem right here.
Reference: http://www.usa.gov/copyright.shtml
"What is a U.S. government work?"
A United States government work is prepared by an officer or employee of the United States government as part of that person's official duties.
It is not subject to copyright in the United States and there are no copyright restrictions on reproduction,
derivative works, distribution, performance, or display of the work. Anyone may, without restriction under U.S. copyright laws:
reproduce the work in print or digital form;
create derivative works;
perform the work publicly;
display the work;
distribute copies or digitally transfer the work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending.
The first step should have been this little gem right here.
Reference: http://www.usa.gov/copyright.shtml
"What is a U.S. government work?"
A United States government work is prepared by an officer or employee of the United States government as part of that person's official duties.
It is not subject to copyright in the United States and there are no copyright restrictions on reproduction,
derivative works, distribution, performance, or display of the work. Anyone may, without restriction under U.S. copyright laws:
reproduce the work in print or digital form;
create derivative works;
perform the work publicly;
display the work;
distribute copies or digitally transfer the work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending.
I don't think the problem is about lost music revenue from copying, but from not buying what you are told you should like by the marketing engine.
This service does an incredible job at finding what people think sounds good and will listen to. It in effect will defeat the media campaigns surrounding their latest release they are trying to market as the latest rage.
It's what they already do for "Sexual Tourism". The concept goes, If you go to another country to have sex with an underage girl and come back to America, they will prosecute you in America, for the illegal sex overseas if they can prove it.
So there's already a precedent of out of jurisdiction prosecution. Might be interesting to see how this plays out.
The 'drag' has changed.
For those that lived in Hollywood, you would understand:
Youtube is the new sunset strip.
Now it just wraps around the entire globe, and the Hollywood sign is a relic.
On the brght side...
Because of this I learned about alternative map software, that's not Google.
Two Children behaving badly.
It's safe to say both parties behaved like children in this incident. At some point in our lives every one of us has done something similar in life. now, can we all get over this and look at more important things?
Re: It's not even illegal,
Booger, Read on:
You cannot use U.S. government trademarks or the logos of U.S. government agencies without permission. For example, you cannot use an agency logo or trademark on your social media page.
Won't be so fast to post next time.
Re: It's not even illegal,
Remove dbl post pls.
It's not even illegal,
The first step should have been this little gem right here.
Reference: http://www.usa.gov/copyright.shtml
"What is a U.S. government work?"
A United States government work is prepared by an officer or employee of the United States government as part of that person's official duties.
It is not subject to copyright in the United States and there are no copyright restrictions on reproduction,
derivative works, distribution, performance, or display of the work. Anyone may, without restriction under U.S. copyright laws:
reproduce the work in print or digital form;
create derivative works;
perform the work publicly;
display the work;
distribute copies or digitally transfer the work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending.
It goes on.
It's not even illegal,
The first step should have been this little gem right here.
Reference: http://www.usa.gov/copyright.shtml
"What is a U.S. government work?"
A United States government work is prepared by an officer or employee of the United States government as part of that person's official duties.
It is not subject to copyright in the United States and there are no copyright restrictions on reproduction,
derivative works, distribution, performance, or display of the work. Anyone may, without restriction under U.S. copyright laws:
reproduce the work in print or digital form;
create derivative works;
perform the work publicly;
display the work;
distribute copies or digitally transfer the work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending.
It goes on.
Not about copying...
This will get shut off faster than snot.
I don't think the problem is about lost music revenue from copying, but from not buying what you are told you should like by the marketing engine.
This service does an incredible job at finding what people think sounds good and will listen to. It in effect will defeat the media campaigns surrounding their latest release they are trying to market as the latest rage.
Welcome to...
The Department of Homeland KGB
Re:
It's what they already do for "Sexual Tourism". The concept goes, If you go to another country to have sex with an underage girl and come back to America, they will prosecute you in America, for the illegal sex overseas if they can prove it.
So there's already a precedent of out of jurisdiction prosecution. Might be interesting to see how this plays out.
- Dan.
Re: Pick one...
Strunk and White much?