So by this yardstick wouldn't that make ANY bar with the game on the big screen guilty of violating the NFL's "copyright" as they or in fact holding a public viewing and through increased bar sales receiving financial benefit. Where do you draw the line ? If here but not there why not ?
Think back to where you saw the download links for limewire ,Kazaa,bit torrent ect.That would be Cnet or Znet owned by CBS-Viacom with partnership and of course download links to ALL of the big boys behind SOPA,PIPA & the next incarnation of this rather nasty set-up. Who was it that gave step by step instructions on how to use this software using COPY WRITTEN music and movies/tv shows as examples ? Who was it that demonstrated the effectiveness of these very programs in side to side comparisons once again using COPY WRITTEN music and movies/tv shows as examples ? And last but no means least Who was it that hosted reviews & blogs extolling the comparative virtues of all of these EEEvillle file sharing programs ? Why that would be our usual suspects Cnet,CBS-Viacom,Disney,and all of the rest of the SOPARISTS.
Just a thought but by distributing and providing step by step instructions on effective use of the file sharing software according to the very laws being used to arrest every one from teenagers to Mega-upload wouldn?t that make the SOPARISTS as guilty if not MUCH more so ?
Also wouldn?t providing the tools necessary, step by step instruction, comparisons and ongoing encouragement be legally regarded as IMPLIED CONSENT or at the VERY least entrapment? Just askin
So to sum up The very groups that originally provided the tools necessary, step by step instruction, comparisons and ongoing encouragement for citizens to download media from the internet are now punishing the leader of the country for not handing over defacto control of the net and arranging to incarcerate ANY citizens using the VERY tools they worked so very hard to get into use?Am I missing anything ? WoW!!!
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by stonecarver.
logical conclusion ?
So by this yardstick wouldn't that make ANY bar with the game on the big screen guilty of violating the NFL's "copyright" as they or in fact holding a public viewing and through increased bar sales receiving financial benefit. Where do you draw the line ? If here but not there why not ?
MPAA threats
Think back to where you saw the download links for limewire ,Kazaa,bit torrent ect.That would be Cnet or Znet owned by CBS-Viacom with partnership and of course download links to ALL of the big boys behind SOPA,PIPA & the next incarnation of this rather nasty set-up. Who was it that gave step by step instructions on how to use this software using COPY WRITTEN music and movies/tv shows as examples ? Who was it that demonstrated the effectiveness of these very programs in side to side comparisons once again using COPY WRITTEN music and movies/tv shows as examples ? And last but no means least Who was it that hosted reviews & blogs extolling the comparative virtues of all of these EEEvillle file sharing programs ? Why that would be our usual suspects Cnet,CBS-Viacom,Disney,and all of the rest of the SOPARISTS.
Just a thought but by distributing and providing step by step instructions on effective use of the file sharing software according to the very laws being used to arrest every one from teenagers to Mega-upload wouldn?t that make the SOPARISTS as guilty if not MUCH more so ?
Also wouldn?t providing the tools necessary, step by step instruction, comparisons and ongoing encouragement be legally regarded as IMPLIED CONSENT or at the VERY least entrapment? Just askin
So to sum up The very groups that originally provided the tools necessary, step by step instruction, comparisons and ongoing encouragement for citizens to download media from the internet are now punishing the leader of the country for not handing over defacto control of the net and arranging to incarcerate ANY citizens using the VERY tools they worked so very hard to get into use?Am I missing anything ? WoW!!!