Ok, I'm a little confused. I thought copyright applied when the performance was recorded on a fixed medium? And were not the Super Bowl broadcasts live with no tape delay in at least the early years? Seems to me that Mr.Haupt should own any copyright on the video that his Dad created.
IANAL, or anything else now.
People that I know that download movies would not go to the theater and see the movies if they couldn't download them. They would simply never see the movies. The people are either too poor to afford to go to the theaters, or disabled and physically unable to go. Others of my acquaintance do go to the theater to see movies they enjoyed after downloading them.
"Oh but their just crows. Fuck em."
Nah, it's a lot more fun to shoot them.
Is this a cut and paste from another article? Or are many now using the word "site" when they actually mean "sight"?
I read an article the other day on the same subject that also used the word "site". Makes me a little suspicious.
What, not even a mention of the TRS-80 and their single board (the name escapes me) computer system? And all their electronic training manuals? They were a go to source for many electronic hobbyists here in flyover country, myself included.
If guns were as easy to get in Europe as they are in the US we might see mass killing in Paris!
Oh, wait.
I use uBlock, AdBlock Plus, NoScript, and Privacy Badger, and view Ars Technica with no problems and no ads.
I pay for sites that I visit frequently via their Donate buttons. I read online fiction series and contribute more than the new cost of a paperback book if I like reading the story and return for future installments.
Your post suggests to me that you feel yourself superior to anyone else here. Since I am sometimes wrong I'm going to give you the benefit of doubt and the opportunity to learn.
Here are a bunch of peer reviewed studies that say you are wrong.
http://medicalmarijuana.procon.org/view.resource.php?resourceID=000884
Please post your thoughts after a thorough review.
Get back to me when bad cops are prosecuted rather than protected by the other cops, will you? And don't even get me started on all the cops seizing pot and money without filing charges and telling the non-accused "so sue me".
Please note that the article refers to the "U.S. Chamber of Commerce", which is nothing more than a lobby for big business. No relation to a local Chamber of Commerce.
What hospital was bombed? I'm only aware of one shot up by an AC-130 Gunship.
Bragging? Or complaining?
Sorry indeed, especially since you're wrong.
Here is a study out of Harvard that will correct your ignorance.
http://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/blog/2013/08/30/harvard-gun-study-no-decrease-in-violence-with-ban/
Where do you get your knowledge concerning those who carry handguns? Video games? Do you actually know anyone that carries a handgun? I do, and a lot of them.
First, no one that I know would pull out their weapon without having a target in mind, as it makes you an instant target for the bad guy. Second, everyone that I know takes the carrying of a gun really seriously, the consequences of shooting the wrong person are horrible,unless you're a cop.
"Armed people in that situation are likely to shoot at any perceived threat." and what, pray tell, makes you such an expert that you can say what I and others are "Likely" to do?
Just because you may panic at the sound of a backfire does not mean that any other person will.
The discussion is about Google News, not Google Search. Google Search works perfectly fine in Spain, but Google News no longer does.
Wow! Attack Techdirt for publishing the age of the Librarian!
Stay stupid AC
Follow the link in the article. Many tech companies are expressing interest and many other school are inviting him to transfer.
Well deserved 15 minutes of fame.
Explain the following quotation without involving racism.
"He said an officer he’d never seen before leaned back in his chair and remarked: “Yup. That’s who I thought it was.”"
I think it may have been possible that Banacek ( http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0068044/ ) was behind it all.
Re:
Not all that long ago, just 21 July 2015 in Wired.
http://www.wired.com/2015/07/hackers-remotely-kill-jeep-highway/