Adblock or userstyles.org can auto-filter that stuff.
What do you think of applying a kind of legal due process to legislation?
The world of safety and security will never exist.
Tool #1: The ability to communicate freely over the internet.
Tool #2: The ability to seize domains or hardware.
Designerfx is talking about #1.
"News Journalism in a Digital World" should include Wikileaks, because Wikileaks is digital journalism. Excluding Wikileaks is a political attempt to redefine journalism to be the restricted, government-approved dispersion of information.
Since this is Redbox's second push to overcome the waiting periods, success here could help legitimize "remote viewing."
WB has to outbid Redbox on the crowdsourcing, then. Not going to happen.
Are you a police officer? Otherwise, you don't get to murder whoever you want because a threat existed somewhere in your unique world view.
This should make the TSA's top 20 for sure this year. They were going to destroy our country!
This is depressing. How to you appeal to an objective source in the presence of groups like the MPAA and RIAA?
Today, people don't spend very much time talking around communal fires. The campfire has expanded to encompass a lot of new places. Story telling is done by recordings.
A wonderful technology has been built around the use of electricity -that's what lightning is made of!- it allows you to easily record and play back all the stories you like. You can send them far away with a tele-vision system! You can look up other stories on something build from a world wide web!
Best of all, nobody is stopping you from playing stories around a television, or on your long-term electronic storage devices. No one is going to stop human nature. That would be bullshit.
It isn't presented as a dichotomy. At most, it requires a zero-sum system.
The implication is that while you might imagine making some money by stopping piracy, there is a more optimal solution that focuses more on making money (involving means other than pirate fighting).
Nor is it false. Were it false, the ability to make the most money in business would be to stop piracy. Since bringing piracy down to zero doesn't win you infinite money (unless your technique includes some kind of apocalyptic economy-consuming machine), there is an obvious ceiling to gains from the pirate-fighting strategy.
How about some kind of education system? Too bad we've been cutting support for elderly college tuition.
It is easy to accept we're on the same side as pirates in this. The mistake this article addresses is a generalization that we are only fighting for piracy.
It is not our responsibility to show up and say "here is how you fight piracy without X or Y that we don't like." Nor is it our responsibility to police the Internet on behalf of legacy institutions.
It is still wrong to burn the entire forest down just because there are some pirates in there.
Same here! Too bad he goes on and on later about other people "living in bubbles." I think Falkvinge made a decent attempt to describe Maher's bubble.
No, sir. This is just my encrypted files collection. I never intended to decrypt ANY of them before.
You have monopolies when you monopolize more than one thing.
Re: Re: I was doing this 4 hours ago
Imagine all the crappy shows HBO distributes that you don't want to watch. If they offered direct streams, they wouldn't have to participate in the voodoo ratings system to figure out which those are. Costs cut. Your welcome, HBO.