If it was anyone other than the chinese government, i would agree this was a bad thing.
However, as they do this on a daily basis preventing foreign own companies operating in China (anyone operating in china has to have a majority local ownership), we are firmly in in pot-kettle territory here.
Its still the wrong reasons on the part of the Cheeto dictator, but i think its the right decision.
Hamas is particularly stupid choice for a nonsense lawsuit. While they are a particularly unpleasant organisation, they seem to keep their terrorist activities confined to Israel.
Presumably because they dont want to end up like Iraq.
Because when everyone knows ewxactly what they are trying to do, everyone and their dog puts in an Amicus brief telling the court exactly why its a stupid idea.
Its pretty much the only way certain varieties of police can hide dodgy requests things these days as even rubber-stamping judges seem to be getting thinner on the ground.
He's fought long and hard about this.
The cheek of the people involved.
Hopefully the beurorcracy will look at this and decide others in the same situation wont have to take the plunge down the rabbithole of stupid regulation before getting a good outcome for all involved.
Yeah, but what if your kid gets hold of it, and you come home from work one day to find they have ordered 100,000 toilet rolls and are now holed up in their new back-garden bog-roll fort!
Thats irrelevent anyway. There suing under copyright law, and kids dont get protection from that.
The fact that only a valid contract gives you permission to use it, means that the fact he COULDNT enter into a contract screws him utterly under coipyright law.
Extortion
If it was anyone other than the chinese government, i would agree this was a bad thing.
However, as they do this on a daily basis preventing foreign own companies operating in China (anyone operating in china has to have a majority local ownership), we are firmly in in pot-kettle territory here.
Its still the wrong reasons on the part of the Cheeto dictator, but i think its the right decision.
But surely...
Law enforcement shouldnt be buying technologies that they cant use in court anyway?
Re: now if the intent is pandering, then Trump is on it
Nah, Cisco have been spinning this sh*t since the Clinton era.
Its only now there is an administration dumb enough to swallow it.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Huawei is now the world leader in 5G deployments
You will when your plan goes up and you buy your next phone
Re: Re: 'Also all soda will be flat and puppies will go blind...
Its also worth noting that all their competitors smell of poo and wee as well, and at least one of them is a massive poopyhead!
Re: US against Huawei
Your discounting the effect of Cisco and its lobbyists.
At least some of these rumours started there.
Re: 'Will you just stop fighting and give us money already?!'
Hamas is particularly stupid choice for a nonsense lawsuit. While they are a particularly unpleasant organisation, they seem to keep their terrorist activities confined to Israel. Presumably because they dont want to end up like Iraq.
Re:
Because when everyone knows ewxactly what they are trying to do, everyone and their dog puts in an Amicus brief telling the court exactly why its a stupid idea. Its pretty much the only way certain varieties of police can hide dodgy requests things these days as even rubber-stamping judges seem to be getting thinner on the ground.
Well done!
He's fought long and hard about this. The cheek of the people involved. Hopefully the beurorcracy will look at this and decide others in the same situation wont have to take the plunge down the rabbithole of stupid regulation before getting a good outcome for all involved.
What the heck are you talking about?
Yeah, but what if your kid gets hold of it, and you come home from work one day to find they have ordered 100,000 toilet rolls and are now holed up in their new back-garden bog-roll fort!
"Silicon Valley really should stop treating fundamental structural issues as political issues,"
Why? it worked wonderfully for the ISP's for Net Neutrality, No reason it shouldnt work for the likes of facebook.
Wow.
Wait a second, my shocked face is comming...... There.. there it is.. Yes, shocked.
Re:
If the car was declared off-road and was parked on the road, there perfectly allowed to take it and crush it.
This would tally with the reduced payout, which would be just for the Maladministration and not informing the owner until after the fact.
However, this is just speculation. The linked article doesnt give enough details.
Rules?
I thaught they were only guidelines, with Guideline #1 being "Dont be so obvious that you get caught and we have to hang you out to dry."
Re:
They probably do, but are hoping that the person receiving teh lawsuit doesnt.
Contract?
Thats irrelevent anyway.
There suing under copyright law, and kids dont get protection from that.
The fact that only a valid contract gives you permission to use it, means that the fact he COULDNT enter into a contract screws him utterly under coipyright law.
Ban?
14 times so far according to the lawsuit.
He also not only used cheats which fks over other players, he openly bragged about it on a Youtube channel which has 8000 subscribers.
When they tried to get the video taken down, the annoying little sht filed a counter-notice. The only option then is to sue or shut up.
Frankly, if it was the case that he had been caught the once, and sued i would have more sympathy.
The 14th time? well to h@ll eith the sociopathic little dck.
Re:
For the people, Certainly, just not you people.