OK, I don't have references without looking hard for them, but I have read reports, some of them very convincing anecdotes regarding implants, some of them old research reports regarding old phones. The effects depend on the strength of the radiation. You can look for them yourself. But you won't, if you don't want to. That's fine - it is part of freedom. But, to deny on that basis that there is any hard evidence of anything really irks me. I have too many times experienced and measured and proved to myself things that other people deny simply because they won't consider the possibility enough to even look.
Knowing how government intelligence operates, my first reaction to this is that the government story is totally false. There were no documents decrypted. They are just using this false story as an excuse to degrade support for Snowden in preparation for an extraordinary extradition.
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it must be a rabbit. Our propaganda minister wouldn't lie to us, would he?
It is obvious that those were controlled demolitions. I have a degree in physics, but that doesn't matter. I have also worked in intelligence agencies and know that the term "conspiracy theorist" is deliberately used to keep secrets by ridicule, but that doesn't matter, either. What matters is deciding whether to believe in your own eyes or in the lies of authority.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Sorgfelt.
see no evidence, hear no evidence, say no evidence
OK, I don't have references without looking hard for them, but I have read reports, some of them very convincing anecdotes regarding implants, some of them old research reports regarding old phones. The effects depend on the strength of the radiation. You can look for them yourself. But you won't, if you don't want to. That's fine - it is part of freedom. But, to deny on that basis that there is any hard evidence of anything really irks me. I have too many times experienced and measured and proved to myself things that other people deny simply because they won't consider the possibility enough to even look.
it is not true
Knowing how government intelligence operates, my first reaction to this is that the government story is totally false. There were no documents decrypted. They are just using this false story as an excuse to degrade support for Snowden in preparation for an extraordinary extradition.
if it quacks like a duck, it must be a rabbit
If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it must be a rabbit. Our propaganda minister wouldn't lie to us, would he?
It is obvious that those were controlled demolitions. I have a degree in physics, but that doesn't matter. I have also worked in intelligence agencies and know that the term "conspiracy theorist" is deliberately used to keep secrets by ridicule, but that doesn't matter, either. What matters is deciding whether to believe in your own eyes or in the lies of authority.