again...
talking about MUSIC
M-U-S-I-C
not
V-I-D-E-O
Although the technology used to stream video is very similar to the technology used to stream music, this particular article doesn't care.
stop simplifying a complicated argument and maybe, just maybe, you'll actually understand that argument enough to argue for or against it.
So i'll stress JAy's point...AGAIN. It's not a case of HOW Fairey did it, it's what he started with and how much of a transformation took place.
Even without a specialized program, such as Photoshop, I could take that photo and simply change the color and background; that would be infringement. Even if I started with a digital photo, though, I could change it enough to call it "transformed".
That sort of thing can be handled by photoshop as well, though, so the point still stands.
You're argument, however, is in stark contrast to the current American business model of government buy-out-ism.
Isn't a country's government supposed to own and control EVERYTHING???
Back in the 80's there was a British band that wrote about this same phenomenon. The song is called...
"Video Killed the Radio Star"
I do so love irony.
It's not a black hole of stupidity. If it were, you wouldn't know it.
just wanted to get my two cents in...
ok I'm done.
Ever watch interviews where a question is asked and the answer given has NOTHING to do with the question?
that's what you're doing here. I know I've made my share of off-topic comments here, but that's as far as I intended them to go. If you're going to debate, debate the topic at hand; don't start a new topic. That's Mike's job.
"...you have to think like an A&R representative when you want to understand how record labels deal with artists of this calibur."
No. I don't. I'm a fan of music. I like music. I like listening to music. Therefore I think like somone who does THOSE things. It's high time A&R reps started to fucking thinking like that!!! That would probably solve a shit-ton of the stupid lawsuits currently in the courts!!
oops forgot the "less-than" ends the statement..
...but under 40 are in the age range of the information revolution. Also, 30-40 are not usually so much AFRAID of technology as unfamiliar with it, but once exposed and/or introduced to new methods they're usually all about it.
I'd even agree to 40+, but
I'm not a NiN fan, but everything I've heard/read about him has led me to believe that he's a very smart man.
" only people who may enter into a contract can enter into this contract."
That is exactly the kind of circular logic that criminal lawyers will use to convict someone who hasn't actually done anything wrong; which is the whole point here.
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
"It would be a civil violation of the TOS."
That was the average citizen's understanding of TOS violations...until Lori Drew got CRIMINALLY convicted for violating MySpace's TOS.
"But the system as it exists now, is utterly ridiculous."
Shhh!! Don't say that too loud! Some lawyer somewhere might sue you for....something....
But everyone knows that you can't make money in a socialist society without them........
Re: I hope the RIAA dies painfully because of its greed
RIAA should take a lesson that should have been learned in the 80's: Music videos. When MTv first hit the airwaves there was a feeling in the industry, albeit minor, that music videos would completely take over and there would be no more sales without video. And no I'm not just talking about the Buggles's song.
However, as we clearly now know, that didn't happen. In fact, music videos ENHANCED music sales. Come on RIAA figure it the f!@# out already!