FISA is nothing but a GOV rubber stamp court. We all know it and they know it.
They refuse to see the changing Internet landscape. I used to host over 200 domains and websites for clients with Netsol in years long past because they were the place to host domain names and websites. But for too many years than I can remember they are not even close to market rates. SO they lost over 120 domains and hosting accounts.
This is just their deathknell. They are looking to milk the last of the revenues the can from the those that were to stupid to leave them 5 years ago.
What that means is if you are not "US" (both meanings)then your info will be gotten. And FU!!!!! You have been PWNED and your info OWNED!
Mike are you lying to us? I am not sure I seen you miss something like that ever or miss including something that should have been. Are you pulling an Obama on us trying to CYA (cover your assets)and then blame it on someone else?
Google Search= Define: TSA = To See Asses
AC you are right. I am so, so very sorry!!! I did do the unpostable.
OOTB,
This is not a class warfare thing. Wow I bet you enjoy your paranoid world view, but those that seek to address real world grievances to our privacy and restrictions do not see it the same way.
But I will agree with you on a couple points.
Yes the best tactic to get people to except something is the graduale method.
Why are people paid just above the minimum wage allowed to decide anything?
They are nothing more than food service vendor employees that wanted to get a fake badge and exercise authority over people that can afford to fly somewhere. They are paid the same. They prove time and time again they do nothing but exercise their own will and preconceived desires to cause discomfort to those that are better off than they are.
They are skilled in nothing but BS scanning procedures that do nothing to actually protect air travelers.
So in the final conclusion expedited security checks are nothing but a PR stunt. Nothing but marketing BS to the masses that they are trying to help and secure.
Google, Apple, M$, et al should make these kind of privacy features standard. Period.
It speaks volumes about how much this type revenue brings in that they do not.
Oh yeah replying to my own comment!
Just saw this article on ARS about why your ISPs are not selling you gigbit internet. http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/12/why-comcast-and-other-cable-isps-arent-selling-you-gigabit-internet/
Also the follow up: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/12/give-us-your-internet-horror-stories-how-does-your-isp-enrage-you/
Ninja,
I have actually been in Comcast test areas in Georgia and have gotten 10 times (no joke) the speed both upload and download I was paying for, but then they extended the bandwidth to others and it dropped.
Agreed, but obvious is not implemented.
Police have by need, circumstance, and desire for power forgotten that they are there to "To Protect and Serve".
Instead they believe they are there to do what they think is OK and act as if they are the power when the power is derived from the authority we give them to enforce the laws we should be defining. They have gone to a place where they react first from over-caution instead of using rational thought.
IMHO if an officer shoots someone it has to be shown without a doubt that they were doing what was required to protect innocents or themselves from real harm. Not just a dude that was unarmed and "OMG" lunging. That officer was a person we do not want helping to enforce our laws.
The NSA is quoted as saying "What we collect is only available if we need it to be and your request does not provide that need"
I know not directly related to this article but please support the patent troll legislation.
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/12/you-have-48-hours
And Kudos to Chris Messina for being so forward thinking!!
So time and time again it has been proven that memory of an event can be modified by our own needs, emotions, morals, and perception.
And studies have show that memory accuracy decreases over time.
See:
http://www.nasams.org/forensics/for_lib/Documents/1150823205.44/Article-Intl%20J.%20L.%20Psy.-Accuracy%20of%20eyewitness%20memory...Morgan.pdf
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/How-Our-Brains-Make-Memories.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flashbulb_memory
So it totally makes sense to let officers to submit statements 72 hours after they have seen video or other evidence to contradict what they might have said.
In other news, regulation to require ISPs to provide true speeds and inform consumers about data caps in their advertising has been met by much resistance from ISPs.
Comcast is quoted as saying "Having to quote the actual speed a consumer will get is too complicated. Additionally, if we are forced to let consumers know that there are caps in a transparent way before they sign we are put at a competitive disadvantage."
So as usual regulators have offered to allow the ISPs to do whatever they want.
I can understand why cops are leery of being recorded. Video can be edited to show a different story than what really happened. Video can be taken out of context and it will show a different story. And things that occur off screen could alter opinions about what really happened.
I also know that cops don't want to be monitored because sometimes they forget they are there to serve us not rule over us.
The statements above suggest not only that Snowden was being truthful, but also that administration and Congressional officials who insist that Snowden gave the documents to the Russian are ignorant or lying.
Yeah well I have heard worse.
I have heard a woman threaten with lawyer in tow (public conversations suck) to sue Apple because an iOS update caused her device to have to be restored and she lost all her progress in Candy (Don't Sue Me) Crush. No Joke.