You have a substantial nonexempt purpose because you develop software published under open source compatible licenses that authorize use by any person for any purpose, including nonexempt purposes such as commercial, recreational, or personal purposes, including campaign intervention and lobbying.
So does the above mean that 501c's with thrift stores will have to close them because people may wear clothes they buy there while at work in a company that doesn't qualify for 501c status? Gee, and I thought I had a cognitive disability!
On the Jones Day logo on the parody website, where the TM mark would normally go, the webmaster has replaced the letters with FU. You can see it for yourself either on the parody site's homepage when it scrolls around, or you can check out the static version.
And this is why I don't have a Facebook account. That and atrocious default privacy settings along with a real name policy that exposes users to doxing while doing nothing about griefers who vandalise other people's memorial walls.
Good idea. A shame that, means it will never be implemented.
No wonder the collective noun for a group of bankers is 'wunch'.
That was kinda the point I was making when putting words into John Legere's mouth.
These so-called "trade negotiations" are not at all about "liberalizing rules and opening borders", or about removing "restrictive, non-compatible financial laws".
Correct. They're about creating restrictive, non-compatible financial laws.
Fair point, I'll try to do that in the future. It's just that after all of OotB's nonsense (and that of those like him), I've unfortunately become a little less discriminating.
Stephenie Lenz's son was a toddler at the time, not a baby. Just a point.
Derek Kerton said: Samsung's notion that video stops playing when you look away from the screen
Tha Lord help Blind people who can only watch videos by listening to them, which doesn't necessarily involve looking at the screen.
AC said: Or perhaps you could elaborate on why Comcast, et.al. do not take advantage of this 'unlimited broadband' in their networks?
Oh, gee. I don't know. Maybe to make more money out of people by imposing artificial limitations and then charging more for greater access? Because I do know that I'm surfing on an unlimited internet right now, courtesy of BT.
@ John Federson: Whatever's problem is that he doesn't have a problem. In fact, I think he's a new iteration of OotB, except that he disagrees with every article here, not just Mike Masnick's. Basically, the prick's a troll, quit feeeding him.
Okay, guys, bend over while we just search your phone records. Oh, that's not where you keep your data? Oops, sorry for the 'mistake'.
Oh, that's nothing. My mum used to get concerned about me playing chess on my PC because it's a computer game, and "everyone knows how violent computer games make you".
the cost of making a film in the studio model starts at $5 million, and ranges right up to $200 million for epics like Skyfall, Man of Steel and Avatar to name a few.
Cool! Let the fuckers cost themselves out of the market while I continue to watch indies.
Choo talkin' 'bout, Willis? Everyone knows that broadband itself is unlimited, and if what you say about LTE radios is true, then that is a physical limitation, not a limitation of the bandwidth. In fact, according to this Wikipedia article, broadband is unlimited because it isn't just what we use modems to access, but also includes dial-up Internet, landlines, analogue TV, and more. Did you even try to do your research before coming out with that crap?
So when the USPTO says they're removing the registration because the term is disparaging and they don't want to grant rights for the team to seek trademark damages to that kind of language in all of our names, I happen to think that make sense.
Actually, it makes no sense at all. Now, if we were talking about changing the logo to a football (which has a reddish brown 'skin'), then that would make sense, but changing a decades old name because a vocal minority got butthurt? I don't think so.
Let me make John Legere's argument for him before someone else thinks of it: "Just as Tom Wheeler is not a dingo, I am not an arsonist. And before John Oliver chimes in, the proof is in the fact that I have never been charged with such crimes."
Really?
The key point about a DRS is that once it exists, it can be searched, read, and actioned by any other machine connected to the Internet.
You mean like CC Licenses already can be?