shawnhcorey 's Techdirt Comments

Latest Comments (88)

• On the post: Resetting The Balance To Save Copyright (Part III)

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 26 May, 2012 @ 07:00am

  Re: Just Say No

  I find that many writers and artists completely ignore two markets: eBay and craigslist. They still want a middleman even with ebooks. In the new world of epublishing, you have to do your own sales or you're just as likely to get screwed as with traditional outlets. :(

• On the post: Resetting The Balance To Save Copyright (Part III)

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 26 May, 2012 @ 05:14am

  Just Say No

  There is no balance; there never was a balance. Have you ever read any of the copyright "agreements" offered to artists and writers? There are for _all_ rights. That means, if you're a musician, and you sell a song to a record label, you _must_ pay for playing your song every time you do so. Yes, even though you created it, you can't play it without paying. If you are a writer and sell a story, you can't write a sequel, prequel, or or work using the any of the characters or settings without giving (that's correct, giving) it to the publisher. And in the US, you can be sued if you don't.
  
  Copyright was never about balance. It's about creating a monopoly for the copyright holders, the big money companies. And by monopoly, it means that big money can force the creators to accept whatever pittance they're willing to give to the creators. Creators do _NOT_ benefit from copyright, only big money.
  
  Copyright: just say no.

• On the post: TV Networks File Legal Claims Saying Skipping Commercials Is Copyright Infringement

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 25 May, 2012 @ 07:48am

  No More Copyright

  And people wonder why I'm against all forms of copyright. There is no way to fix[1] copyright to prevent insanity like this from happening. Copyright: Just Say No.
  
  [1] Unless by fix, you mean neutered.

• On the post: Want More Jobs? Get Rid Of The Patent Trolls

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 22 May, 2012 @ 05:25am

  Want More Jobs...

  Get rid of patents. And get rid of copyright while you're at it.
  
  Both patents and copyright create artificial monopolies and stifle any improvements. The sooner we are rid of them, the better off we'll all be.

• On the post: EU Commissioner Kroes: 'We Are Now Likely To Be In A World Without SOPA And Without ACTA'

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 05 May, 2012 @ 05:35am

  Yay!

  Now all we have to do is get a world without copyrights and patents.

• On the post: Can CISPA Be Fixed?

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 26 Apr, 2012 @ 11:13am

  Fixed as in neutered or splayed? Sounds good to me. :D

• On the post: It's Time To Re-Establish That If A Patent Blocks Progress, It's Unconstitutional

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 20 Apr, 2012 @ 06:34am

  Just Say No

  The problem with patents is that they're relatively easy to get and difficult to get rid of. It is this simple fact that allows them to grow and encroach on areas that the legislators could not envision when they created the laws. Resetting patent law back to what it should be will not stop this behaviour. It will just come back sooner or later (most likely sooner). The only way to stop patents from stifling innovation is to get rid of it completely. Patents: just say no.

• On the post: IP Throwdown: Patent Lawyers Sued For… Copyright Infringement

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 01 Mar, 2012 @ 06:15pm

  Re: Re: Re: In the crapper!

  Don't forget the sewage cap. You can only flush a limit amount of crap every month. if you go over, you have to pay more, a lot more.

• On the post: Apparently, If Your Domain Has 'Dirt' In The Name, Section 230 Safe Harbors Don't Apply (Uh Oh…)

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 28 Jan, 2012 @ 06:57am

  "It mostly involves user submissions of pictures of women, along with generally mean commentary from the user -- and then maybe a short comment from the site's owner."
  
  The site's owner is responsible for his comments and they are not exempt under section 230.

• On the post: What Is ACTA And Why Is It A Problem?

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 25 Jan, 2012 @ 07:21am

  Re: Re: The Tip of the Iceberg

  True but if ratified, big content will use it as an excuse to reintroduce SOPA/PIPA-like legislation, claiming it is absolutely necessary to be compliant with ACTA.

• On the post: An Updated Analysis: Why SOPA & PIPA Are A Bad Idea, Dangerous & Unnecessary

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 18 Jan, 2012 @ 12:22pm

  Goodbye USA

  With all the American sites protesting SOPA/PIPA, there are few which have figured out what they actually mean. If they get passed, then the US will be isolated from the rest of the internet. And for some strange reason, they think this will be a hardship for the rest of the world. Stop living in the 20th century. Since the crash of '08, the rest of the world has been trying to make up its mind whether the US is that important anymore. And most are thinking it's not. It would be ashamed if they were passed but if they are, say hello to backwater USA.

• On the post: Congressional Research Service Shows Hollywood Is Thriving

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 12 Dec, 2011 @ 12:31pm

  "It doesn't sound like things are that bad these days in Hollywood. So why do we need massive legal changes again?"
  
  So the content providers can control the internet.

• On the post: As We Complain About SOPA & PIPA, Don't Forget The DMCA Already Has Significant Problems

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 02 Dec, 2011 @ 02:07pm

  There is nothing wrong with DMCA. Currently it allows anyone in the US to remove any content from the web just by posting a notice, exactly what the big-content companies want. Well, not completely. It is still too reasonable priced; it allows little companies to take down big-content sites too but, don't worry, they going to change that soon. ;)

• On the post: India Wants UN Body To Run The Internet: Would That Be Such A Bad Thing?

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 03 Nov, 2011 @ 08:07am

  Of Course It's a Bad Thing

  Putting the internet under the control of a small group just makes it easier for the 1% to get their greedy hands on it. The internet will better serve the People if it remains the way it is, distributed.

• On the post: Ding Dong: Another DRM Is Dead… And With It All The Files You Thought You Bought

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 01 Nov, 2011 @ 01:23pm

  Just Say No

  There are plenty on DRM-free music and videos available on the internet to fit any tastes (and some are exceeding tasteless for those who like bland :)). I haven't listen to music from the record labels in years. There is plenty of other selection.
  
  DRM: just say no.

• On the post: Righthaven Asks Court To Speed Up Ruling Against It So It Doesn't Have To Pay For A Trial

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 31 Oct, 2011 @ 11:34am

  Why don't they just plea guilty and end it right there?

• On the post: BSA Wants To Export Insane Statutory Damages For Copyright Infringement To Other Countries

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 28 Oct, 2011 @ 01:53pm

  Stop Software Piracy; Use Only FLOSS

  Everyone should do what they can to stop software piracy. Use only FLOSS. Since it's free, it can't be pirated.

• On the post: No Surprise: Scammers Focus On Tricking The French With False Three Strikes Infringement Notices

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 20 Oct, 2011 @ 09:41am

  If anyone refuses cash, then they forgive the debt.

• On the post: Publishers Realizing There's Revenue In Selling Ebooks Of Old Content… Even If It's Available For Free

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 13 Oct, 2011 @ 07:51am

  Baen Free Library has been doing this for years. Jim Baen firmly believed offering free ebook downloads of popular books increased sales of real books.
  
  See http://www.baen.com/library/

• On the post: As Expected, Alternative DNS Systems Sprouting Up To Ignore US Censorship

  

  shawnhcorey ( profile ), 11 Oct, 2011 @ 08:38am

  How can the US government be so stupid about the internet. At one time, DNS resided on servers because they were the only things big enough for it. But today, even a MP3 play has enough capacity to host DNS. There is nothing to stop everyone from downloading and running a personal DNS, with multiple sources from anywhere in the world. All this censorship does is put more power in the hands of the people.

Next >>