This would explain why I tend not to trust reviews like this anymore. I like negative reviews because it provides perspective. Some times features I personally liked) vs the reviewer didn't) are criticized in a negative review. I now know it has a feature I like. The fact the overall review was negative doesn't necessarily matter to me in that regard.
It is an interesting read when someone who lives/works in a bubble is calling everyone else idiots.
I just don't read Forbes anymore. I don't have an ad blocker and frankly I don't need one. If I encounter a site with super aggressive ads, I just don't visit them anymore. Plenty of other non intrusive places to read the same news.
I tried their ad-light version. You still get hit pretty hard with ads. And the player crashes or glitches a lot so you get hit with ads again after it 'refreshes'.
I canceled and won't be going back.
I stopped watching said group years ago over this ever increasing ridiculous behavior. Not to mention, they've become an international embarrassment.
After they upgraded my laptop without even asking me, I ditched windows completely. I won't be going back anytime soon.
I already avoid Forbes due to their invasive ads. This just makes it easier. I don't mind small unobtrusive ads but Forbes has some of the most invasive and persistent ads I've ever seen. I never visit GQ so no reason to start now I guess.
Dumped them about a year ago over this very issue and have no plans to play any of their games again.
Honestly, I don't see this catching on in a big way. Even for companies like Zipcar that depend partly on an honor system, user integrity is a problem. I don't have faith that enough car owners would maintain their vehicles to a standard most us are accustomed to while renting a vehicle.
I can just imagine the nightmare once a vehicle breaks down thru no fault of the driver and the owner freaks out. That is one scenario of many I see plaguing such an idea.
The old distribution models are dying. Sadly, instead of adapting many companies, including newspapers, are holding onto the old method for dear life. They inaccurately blame pirating and pursue ridiculous copyright restrictions in a desperate attempt to stop the inevitable.
Taser's are considered non-lethal / less-lethal weapons...Borrowing from Wikipedia, "It is often understood that accidental, incidental, and correlative casualties are risked wherever force is applied, but non-lethal weapons try to minimize the risk as much as possible." In laymen's terms, while using a taser can sometimes result in a negative outcome, it is preferred over shooting someone, which guarantees a negative outcome. This is a primary reason many law-enforcement agencies resort to tasers.
Contrary to some of the statements here, you are not allowed to walk-away or refuse to be questioned by a sworn officer. It is true an officer should have probable cause to detain you. However, just because you disagree with his reasoning or feel otherwise, you cannot refuse to comply. Under the law, you are required to comply. If you feel the officer unfairly targeted you or behaved inappropriately there are legal and civil avenues you can pursue at a variety of levels.
Refusing to comply when stopped or questioned and attempting to flee; however peaceful, is an invitation in the use of increased force to detain you. Not to mention, suspicion was heightened when the person lied and gave a fake name.
I am not condoning the officer's or the citizen's actions as the story is vague at best. Making judgments w/so little info is an exercise in futility.
I avoid all UbiSoft titles, have for awhile. A shame because I like many of their games. The headache and BS associated with DRM just isnt worth it to me. I can find other games to enjoy w/o feeling like a criminal just because I reinstall it or upgrade hardware.
Bias mucg
Overlooking the author's snobby overgeneralization of all police, methods that produce accurate results are better for everyone, including the officers. Approaching from the perspective of protecting officers from false accusations would likely result in a better selling point to get them to support it.