The term you're looking for is "shooting the messenger."
Damn it! I would have paid good money to see a shaky-cam recording of his rant!
You're complaining? I'm surprised.
Somehow the "latest results" doesn't show as a link:
http://www.jpost.com/Iranian-Threat/News/Report-Wave-of-cyber-attacks-on-US-originating-in-Iran-314308
The general attitude of the IP industries seems to be "We can do it to you, but you can't do it to us. After all, we're the good guys."
They might want to pay close attention to the latest results of the US/Israeli Stuxnet project.
The late Joseph Sobran once remarked that America was an experiment to determine whether or not a documented set of rules could restrain government from growing into tyranny. He then commented that the results were clear: it couldn't.
Supreme excellence in the art of marketing is making the customer happy to give you money in exchange for what you offer.
The MPAA/RIAA/(most)Publishers seem to think using the law to extract money by force or threat of force is a perfectly satisfactory replacement for the above.
California runs on Macs, Georgia runs on Windows. So you can't run California applications in Georgia.
Maybe, but if everybody who hates abuse of the law wanted to show up, the Colosseum wouldn't be big enough even at a thousand dollars a ticket.
Just sayin'.
This is also the first legalese I've ever read which, IMO, qualifies as a work of art.
How do people whose connection to reality is THAT tenuous rise to high corporate positions?
I'm having to watch my diet. Anybody got a healthy snack suggestion while I enjoy "Kerfuffle From Hell aka The Prenda Story"?
Not simply greedy. Greedy AND stupid.
His track record includes such classics as "Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow", "The Ages of Love" etc. etc.
He should at least wait to sue until he's been involved in a movie that's worth stealing.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust
Just askin' :)
In other words, "Trust us." with no way to verify.
Short form translation is "FO."