I think a lot of great arguments have been presented in this article and subsequent discussion. The only thing I would like to add is a question: are we properly protecting the interests of generations to come. or are we stretching the time for innovations to emerge in a legitimate way?
That is one question that remains to be answered. If copyright nowadays serves a legitimate purpose or not. I believe it does not, that currently all it does is taking tools away from people that allows them to be creative.
Should nature be entitled to sue humanity for all the inspiration derived from observation and "copying"?
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by Matias Buselli.
V for Vendetta
I guess Alan Moore was wrong as to where his future would take place by just one letter, an S instead of a K.
I think a lot of great arguments have been presented in this article and subsequent discussion. The only thing I would like to add is a question: are we properly protecting the interests of generations to come. or are we stretching the time for innovations to emerge in a legitimate way?
That is one question that remains to be answered. If copyright nowadays serves a legitimate purpose or not. I believe it does not, that currently all it does is taking tools away from people that allows them to be creative.
Should nature be entitled to sue humanity for all the inspiration derived from observation and "copying"?