However, the crossover audience for Google is incredibly high. Searching her name or phrases mentioned in the article on Google will give the techdirt result as well.
"The problem with allowing India to steal technology is that they will manufacture the drug themselves, sell it for next to nothing and big pharma cannot 1) recoup its initial investments in the drug and 2) create new drugs."
a. The Indian companies do have to pay these companies a part of the price, so this would actually help the company to recoup its initial investment
b. The Bayer CEO has clearly said that the drugs are not for Indians. If they do not sell their product in India and have no plans to do so, how would a different company selling it in India hurt them financially or prevent them from creating new drugs?
Didn't know that our government does this. It's a really good move since 1. The dollar to rupee conversion will put the product out of reach of most Indians 2. Most Indians don't have a health insurance like in the US, so the money has to come from their pockets 3. These American companies are free to sell their product in India and since the generic companies have to pay them a part of the price, they can easily undercut them. Not doing so is only artificially inflating the price while people die daily
Re: Re: Re: Dumb publication publishes dumb article
However, the crossover audience for Google is incredibly high. Searching her name or phrases mentioned in the article on Google will give the techdirt result as well.
Re: Thats Because Their All Liberals
While attempting to relate an unrelated topic, at least try to get the attacking country right!
Re: This Article is Idiotic
"The problem with allowing India to steal technology is that they will manufacture the drug themselves, sell it for next to nothing and big pharma cannot 1) recoup its initial investments in the drug and 2) create new drugs."
a. The Indian companies do have to pay these companies a part of the price, so this would actually help the company to recoup its initial investment
b. The Bayer CEO has clearly said that the drugs are not for Indians. If they do not sell their product in India and have no plans to do so, how would a different company selling it in India hurt them financially or prevent them from creating new drugs?
Capitalism at its worst. Luckily, someone is standing up against it.
Re: How long before someone makes...
I guess this rule applies only to the Eurpoean google sites, not the google.com or google.in (for example) sites.
So it should be possible to get the google.com results, get the google europe results, then subtract the two, especially the top ten hits.
Is it possibly that he could be paid by the journalist to make that comment and give a whole lot of attention to the article?
Re:
So say we all!
Re:
I've never been to an American airport, but is it possible that they were screened at another point of time by actual TSA reps?
Good going
Didn't know that our government does this. It's a really good move since
1. The dollar to rupee conversion will put the product out of reach of most Indians
2. Most Indians don't have a health insurance like in the US, so the money has to come from their pockets
3. These American companies are free to sell their product in India and since the generic companies have to pay them a part of the price, they can easily undercut them. Not doing so is only artificially inflating the price while people die daily
Well, the first thing you read on the website scotusblog.com is "Supreme Court of the United Status Blog"
This doesn't really make it clear that it's a press blog