I'm for the current system with all its inherent flaws. But maybe only because I can't think of a better alternative.
Are murder trials using DNA evidence any less technical? Or do the attorneys and expert testimony know how to present the evidence in such a way that the jury can understand, and make a good decision?
Just as with murder trials, there is more evidence presented than just the technical details on which, say, the forensic lab technician would need to review.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by S3CEO_jholt.
Impartiality
Interesting discussion.
I'm for the current system with all its inherent flaws. But maybe only because I can't think of a better alternative.
Are murder trials using DNA evidence any less technical? Or do the attorneys and expert testimony know how to present the evidence in such a way that the jury can understand, and make a good decision?
Just as with murder trials, there is more evidence presented than just the technical details on which, say, the forensic lab technician would need to review.