I don't know why they would need to transfer any copyrights to use the DMCA. After all, we already have people using it to censor material that doesn't belong to them.
I hope this guy isn't indicative of the intelligence level all DA's. Unfortunately, he probably is.
Sounds to me like the US intelligence community is directing the ISIS attacks to better enable its police state.
What might work though is to give them so much data that they drown in it. Oh, wait. Isn't that what's happening now?
Actually, it's not surprising that we are having this debate now. Our government today has about as much in common with its early years as man has to monkeys. They were trying to live in a real democracy then and now they are doing their best to prevent it.
This didn't really have anything at all to do with trademark...Only about keeping the poor, unfortunate lawyers gainfully employed.
Too bad we can't just get rid of all the lawyers... ;>
I just wanted to thank you for being courageous enough to do this. I've been an Insider for as long as you have offered it and I still have my "Looooots for shirts" t-shirt. I am more than willing to support you through these types of things, especially if I get to kill the ads. Too bad others don't follow this example.
Why is it that the more "national security" we get, the less secure I feel?
"If these people are so sure that Dotcom is guilty, why not wait until that's shown in a court of law, rather than having to go through this separate process to take all of his stuff?"
When you know you can't win, cheat. If he has no assets, he can't defend himself.
They may have had good on their side at some point a long time ago, but once they decided they were above any law they became nothing more than criminals.
"...this seems like yet another example of the DOJ being out of control..."
I think restricting this statement to the DOJ is a possible mistake. Shouldn't that have said "example of the Executive branch being out of control?
This is why governments want to define "Journalists" as only those working for major media outlets.
Not to be an advocate for it, but the Corporate Sovereignty provisions in TTIP might cure this nonsense. Unfortunately, even that "bright" spot is enough to make those trade agreements worth the costs.
"Perhaps it's time to move in the other direction and take away the government's mandate over "cybersecurity" because it's shown little indication that it can handle the problem."
Seconded!!!
It just shows the lack of intelligence/integrity/moral values we have at the top levels of our government.
"...it's unfair to compare TPP to NAFTA because they're different deals:"
Of course they are different deals; TPP is MUCH worse for the public.
"...a "good guys only" backdoor."
And what happens when the "good guys" go bad? Will they spontaneously lose the Key? After all, we know ALL law enforcement personnel are the honest "good guys."
What??? You EXPECT law enforcement to make the public SAFER?