Your pedantry is impressive. If your only real complaint is that I used "child" instead of "non-adult", I'll take that as a compliment. Given the strict definition of "child", you're technically right, which is the best kind of right.
If I can be a small repository of respite for you by showing you some lower scale stupid, I'll take it :)
"You…you realize you lost, right? Your next chance to “send someone packing” will be 2028, and honestly your odds don’t look good." Super good point. After all, a cabinet secretary has never been ousted before the end of the President's term....
"The point is that if a Christian/conservative posts an includivity poster,then you don’t think that they are welcome, thereby proving that the “Everyone is welcome” solgan is definitely political." Exactly what are you basing that bullshit conjecture on?
Other than a lame attempt at both-sides-ing this, what does that have to do w/the post above, Scooter?
Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just: that his justice cannot sleep for ever: that considering numbers, nature and natural means only, a revolution of the wheel of fortune, an exchange of situation, is among possible events: that it may become probable by supernatural interference! — Thomas Jefferson, Notes on the State of Virginia
He will absolutely not get convicted. I don't see any route to either side getting two-thirds of the Senate seats, which is what the Dems would need to get a conviction, given the Cult of Donald that is the GOP. Whatever mechanism we want to employ to stop this fascist takeover, it sure as shit is not impeachment.
There's more nuance to it than that, but you essentially have it right. Statements made within a lawsuit can have qualified privelage, as those statements are themselves the subject of the civil suit. Were those statements found to be defamatory, meaning lies told with knowledge of their falsity, there are mechanisms for punishment for that, but they otherwise are assumed to be made in good faith as part of the suit itself. Otherwise, every single civil suit could be countersued for defamation and you would see that all over the place. https://www.bdblaw.com/privilege-defense-in-a-defamation-case/
Very cute, but inaccurate, as per usual. IL just passed its 2026 budget. It is balanced. GOP in IL are reduced to not liking how the accounting is done in the numbers when it comes to specific programs, but even they aren't trying to say it's not a balanced budget: https://abc7chicago.com/post/illinois-senate-passes-state-55b-budget-new-taxes-sports-bets-nicotine-products-income-sales-not-affected/16619774/ And the state is most certainly not seeing any kind of material decline in population. It goes up, it goes down, it goes up, it goes down in the past five years. The longer term trend is one of population growth, not decline. https://www.macrotrends.net/global-metrics/states/illinois/population
I can see your point here and it reminds me of my favorite bible story, the Good Samaritan, where the Samaritan sees the suffering person dying after being robbed on the side of the road, heads over to provide help, but then remembers that nobody has paid for him to ease the suffering of others and spits on the poor person instead, before kicking him in the ribs for good measure. Also, your entire post is essentially an advertisement for raising taxes, particularly on the wealthy.
You'll see more on the EULA changes shortly :) That said, I wasn't aware of the Brazil piece of that. I'll have to look into it.
It's quite easy to understand how the actual points in the post flew over your head, given you were down on the ground licking Trump's boots....
"The risk to the general populace (who all have measles shots) is fairly low." This is a misunderstanding of the state of things currently. The general populace is NOT all MMR protected. Current vax rates for MMR among the public is at roughly 93%, less than the 95% required for herd immunity protection. In addition, that vax rate has been falling for several years and is continuing to do so. This puts many more people at risk, while also allowing the disease to infect more hosts and, potentially, to evolve beyond current protections. IOW, this is a problem for all of us, not just the unvaxxed.
Your confidence in whatever tool your using to try to split a hair this fine is misplaced, my friend....
Until we find out that this victim of American trafficking is no longer alive. He had a status preventing him from being sent to El Salvador for a reason, after all....
I was not aware that HHS held dominion over the healthcare of other nations. I recognize that every time you comment, you're trying to make a plea for every country other than America, but this post and those before it are about the American HHS secretary. What exactly are you looking for?
And what if they decide to deceive, or are perceived to have deceived, audiences in a way that doesn't specifically involve so-called "doctoring" or an interview. That's the problem with actions like this. They aren't as closed-ended as you seem to think they are. For example, should Newsmax even have a license anymore after this? https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/newsmax-agreed-pay-40-million-settle-defamation-suit-over-2020-false-election-2025-03-13/
You folks really, REALLY don't want to go down this road. The GOP won't be in power forever and eventually this sort of censorship program will be turned around on the likes of Fox, NewsMax, etc. I don't want that to happen. And neither should you.
I'm sorry, are you somehow so naive so as to think that great and mid-sized powers don't have contingency warplans drawn up in the event of a real life conflict? What are you actually complaining about?
Watched it
I watched the hearing. It was WILD. I need to digest it once more before I write something about it :)