So let's say that I make a video or write something that I try very hard to make seem to come from Mr. Masnick. A future potential employer of Mr. Masnick's decides, based upon the content of what I wrote (again, apparently as Mr. Masnick), not to offer him the 200k/yr job. Should I be held accountable?
The video was released. it was tweeted and retweeted. The MSM picked up on it and instantly attributed it to Paul's campaign, thereby giving the impression that Paul had approved of the video. Sounds like either one-off libel or slander to me, depending on the direction you come from. Seems to me the Paul has the right to attempt to protect his good name. Why his lawyers chose to make it a commercial issue is beyond my knowledge. The sad part is that evidence points right back to Huntsman's campaign.
Techdirt has not posted any stories submitted by David Rairigh.
Let me see if I understand
So let's say that I make a video or write something that I try very hard to make seem to come from Mr. Masnick. A future potential employer of Mr. Masnick's decides, based upon the content of what I wrote (again, apparently as Mr. Masnick), not to offer him the 200k/yr job. Should I be held accountable?
let's see
The video was released. it was tweeted and retweeted. The MSM picked up on it and instantly attributed it to Paul's campaign, thereby giving the impression that Paul had approved of the video. Sounds like either one-off libel or slander to me, depending on the direction you come from. Seems to me the Paul has the right to attempt to protect his good name. Why his lawyers chose to make it a commercial issue is beyond my knowledge. The sad part is that evidence points right back to Huntsman's campaign.