issue 1: your article was fantastic mike, would have been even better if you had included some thoughts on the perils of trusting a third party, this "cloud" we speak of way too often, which leads to
issue 2: i researched the subject but came up empty...how to self-host embeddable pdf documents. as the html5 standard becomes more and more implemented, hopefully some enterprising young coder will put together such a tool: a plug-in for your c.m.s. to accomplish just that.
after all, it makes sense for a leading professor (mr. goldman) or a leading blogger to be a repository of such documents and resources.
hulu has cried wolf for the last time for me. paraphrasing, "i know it sux, i get it, i don't want to do it, it's not my fault..."
a not so thorough search of this magnificent site turns up a slew of similar entirely consistent stories, here's one:
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20090218/1627113821.shtml
may i suggest mike that in the future you drop the dichotomy: if they're being honest they must want to disrupt their patrons, if only said patrons weren't idiots, and get to the heart of the matter...
hulu is nothing more than internet protocol broadcasting, and broadcasters are, of course, fully deserving of your most withering sneer :).
If there are issues, then he should focus on those he believes are of paramount importance...
Mr. Love seems to be quite adept at generating "OMG" scenarios...
as my kiwi friends say john, good on'ya! i know a fight isn't what you wanted, but you've got a good one on your hands, with lots of support out there in internet-land.
ianal, but you've got a bunch of options available short of court, where even if they file, you fold at that point. the court of public opinion has its own resources and leverage.
continued success.
...by the time the product reaches me , it no longer has the DRM in it.
i took the liberty of posting on the original article. hopefully more folks 'round here will as well, politely inform the author of what an ostrich the poor guy is.
so while i cannot present any bona fides from any legacy industry, i can only hope my thought passes moderation.
mr. langeveld, you speak again and again of "the bounds of their own sites", and "confine news content to tightly-controlled channels", and the horror of "when content moves outside those bounds", to the point where you appear risibly cervante-esque.
this network of networks against which you tilt (we call it now colloquially the internet), from it's initial design and purpose, to its subsequent design principles (open with open standards), to the accretion of sophisticated developments, hardware and software innovations, later democratization and mass acceptance and use, all mean one thing:
you have lost control of distribution. full stop.
you can either fight to re-gain a lost nirvana of monopoly rents, or you can embrace a present and future of leveraging an infinite non-rivalrous artifact to sell something scarce and compelling.
a licensing fee (for news? really?), its attendant bureaucracy and market distortions, is neither.
...but it does not give them a veto card over government legislation, unless it is very specifically limited free speech.
if this decision curtailed your free speech rights, posting about it would break the law...
"Enter Blender"
"In five to ten years the processing power to do Avatar will be available on a mid to high end workstation."
Overall, fun, thoughtful and harmless speculation by Mike here.
But, most importantly, not without precedent in the sense that the offending organizations and the individuals who run them demonstrably have their heads buried as far up their rear quarters as conceivably possible (as amply noted by Mike).
And, like probably quite a lot of folks within this community, would be quite excited by such a lawsuit. One for the sheer joy of watching another utter FAIL by the recording industry, but, two also by the fact that such a suit would take, what, 5 years to come to a decision?
How many millions of kids coming of age and going to college would Big Content alienate in this time? How many millions of young adults graduating from college and entering the world would Big Content alienate in this time?
Yep, ANOTHER entire generation, lost as potential customers. Tell me that's not fun to watch.....
...more protected free speech and activity as an internet user than in public...
Perhaps if more people voted with their wallet, instead of their ripper, the consumer offering would match up better.
my bad :(
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31150167/Copyright-owners-amicus
bingo!!
But what if a site was set up that didn't do all of those things, but was still widely used for infringement.
isn't this point quite similar to matt mason's proposition that historically "pirates" are those who are just quicker to find and exploit failures in an existing marketplace (i.e. web of economic relationships)?
the pirate's dilemma:
http://www.amazon.com/Downloading-Sneakers-Reinvented-Capitalism-Innovation/dp/1416532188
i see your horsehockey and raise you two cow patties.
disruption always wins. i agree that mr gurley, of all people, should understand this.
...before we forward the DMCA notice to you.
Re: html5
go figger :). five minutes later:
http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/google-document-embedder/